3D TV appeals to just 2 per cent of Brits

A mere 2 per cent of people in the UK are planning to buy a 3D-enabled TV in the next year, according to a new survey.

Of 4,199 UK shoppers quizzed, only 89 of them said they would seriously consider buying a 3D-ready television in the next 12 months, the Telegraph reports. The research was conducted by YouGov for auditor Deloitte and flies in the face of TV manufacturers, many of whom have made a big deal of 3D with this year's ranges.

In a bid to get 3D hardware in the shops before the maiden broadcast of Sky 3D at the start of October, manufacturers including Samsung, Sony and Panasonic have already begun selling 3D TVs. These will be able to display stereoscopic images that, when viewed through specially adapted glasses -- often bought separately -- allow the broadcast images to appear three-dimensional.

People aged 25 to 34 were more enthusiastic, but still only 5 per cent would likely buy a 3D TV before the summer of 2011. An insignificant 1 per cent of people over the age of 44 would consider it.

It's not just 3D that us Englishmen and women have no love for, however, with precious little interest in any new TV service or product, such as Internet-enabled TVs or Sky+. Only 7 per cent of people surveyed (who didn't already have one) said they'd consider investing in an HD TV, despite its relative maturity.

So it may well be that it's not that people aren't interested in watching TV with silly glasses on, but rather they're not comfortable admitting to planning a major splurge on consumer tech in the middle of a recession.

At time of writing, no sales figures were available to show the present state of 3D TV sales, but there's optimism in the air. Bob Darke, Comet's commercial director, has claimed that "thousands" of 3D TVs have been sold and other retailers are reporting significant interest in the technology.

There was a spike in sales of 3D TVs in May, according to Darke, which might be attributed to people upgrading to the latest TV ranges in time for the World Cup, despite the games not being broadcast to homes in 3D.

Comments 16

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 August, 2010 17:02

Dought its even 2%.

3D is a complete waste of money.

Didn't take of in the 50/60/80's and will soon be gone from the Boringwood movies.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 August, 2010 17:30

Im 25 and I've been looking for a new TV for a while now Since I thought that when 3D BluRay hits the PS3 it might be good to have.

I tested one of the Samsung 3DTVs in Currys, and it was the most horrible TV experience I've ever had.

The glasses were stupid looking, they washed out the colours, they hurt behind my ears to wear them over my own glasses, and they took about 30 seconds to sync with the TV picture.

All this and they wanted £3000 for it, Don't think so.

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 26 August, 2010 17:42

Paul and Peter, as befits your names, the havoc you have wreaked on the English language is truly biblical. Congrats.

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 26 August, 2010 17:59

I have tested out sony's 3d tv as was blown away by it, will have to wait for it to ome down in price, ut would like to know out of the survey how many have tried it and how many still thought it was the paper glasses you got in the last wave of 3d tvs

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 August, 2010 18:28

anonymous 26 August, 2010 17:42


Terribly sorry old bean, sorry I did not go to Oxbridge, also sorry to see you were not given a name by your parents..
still thank you so much for you input into 3D television in the United Kingdom.

Or should we just call you Mr Asshate.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 August, 2010 19:54

They're massively overpriced, they give you headaches, mess with your eyes' focusing/depth-perception, wash out the contrast and make you look nerdy to boot. Not surprised.

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 26 August, 2010 22:29

I think they are just brilliant. We have a Panasonic 50inch 3D TV and i can honestly say its is well worth the money but i can see why people are put of because of how expensive they are, but look at it like this the prices will have dropped massively by next year so i think they will catch on but it wont start until next year. We have sky 3D and im telling you the excitement for its launch in october is just to much, considering I'm a regular football and movie viewer on sky.

Also i downloaded a 3D game pack for my ps3 and its such a different experience and is genuinely greatttt. the glasses are not uncomfortable at all but i do think they look a bit funny but who cares when your in your own home!! They dont wash out contrast in fact the picture is stunning, i never new watching animals would be an enjoyable experience just because its in 3D!

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 26 August, 2010 22:50

To paul turner:3D never took off in `the 50`s,60`s &80`s` because it was crap tech back then.Whilst I will admit to have not viewed a 3D TV,as yet and cannot comment on its performance,I have seen several films at the cinema and they are amazing. Avatar,which I doubt you made the time to see,was a cinematic experience that nearly made my head explode due to its 3D effects,story and sheer beauty. so my friend before you make such stupid outdated comments know your facts!

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 27 August, 2010 11:26

What???! 2%? Thought it will be 0.2%

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 27 August, 2010 12:30

Anon, Avatar's story nearly made your head explode? You must have a lower IQ than the cheese sandwich I'm eating!

billfred's avatar

billfred 27 August, 2010 12:48

@anon 26th Aug 22:50

Really, even in the cinema it fails to truly impress. Avatar did look pretty sweet in parts, but some of it was still kinda blurry and the dulling of the colours grinds. 3D was even attempted in the 20's, so I really think it's time to give up!

Mark Anderson's avatar

Mark Anderson 27 August, 2010 16:09

Any device that requires glasses to use safely which doesn't put holes in things or chop them into smaller pieces is stupid.

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 27 August, 2010 19:05

I have 3D Tv and its absolutely amazing, just waiting for more content,, bring it on 3D.... Dont know where you negative lot have seen, if you have,,,,,,,,,,,,

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 29 August, 2010 10:25

not all 3D tv's are equall go to your local store and compare ,some brands are rubish and others impresive

billfred's avatar

billfred 29 August, 2010 12:20

your standard seem pretty low

Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous 4 September, 2010 14:24

i went to see avatar 3d at the cinema and it was great even though i had to put up with a second pair of glasses over my own and the plot was about as interesting as a cheese sandwich. i would probably watch another 3d movie at the cinema even if the plot was thin. however the idea of putting up with the specs carry on at home is ludicrous in my opinion. at home i want to communicate with others, adjust the lighting, go get my gin + tonic from the fridge, pause the movie, answer the phone etc. etc. so specs at home is the most ridiculous idea i ever thought of. i wish they would drop it before i get angry and start randomly attacking tv retailers shop fronts !

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2012 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.