This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Spotify adds 500,000 paying subscribers after throttling free tunes

Music streaming front-runner Spotify saw a massive increase in the number of people who actually pay for the service after it seriously restricted the amount of music users get when using the free version, according to leaked reports Music Ally claims to have received.

In April, Spotify strangled its free service, limiting you to just 10 hours of music playback per month, and only letting you play individual tracks five times ever.

The idea was to push those users who enjoy the service into forking out for the paid version, which also lets you access Spotify's music databank from your phone using iOS and Android apps, and it looks as though the gamble paid off.

Between March and June this year, Spotify grabbed 520,000 paying subscribers, taking it up to a grand total of 1.54 million users who were willing to splash out actual cash-money to use the service -- a 50 per cent increase -- and 4.67 million users in total.

Interestingly, Spotify actually lost users overall since making the changes. In March it had 5.75 million users in total, which maths fans will identify is more than the 4.67 million users it had as of June.

But half a million customers paying for the service is a lot more valuable than a million freeloaders.

We reckon the initial changes were due to pressure from the music labels that lend their tunes to Spotify in the first place. A jump in paying users could appease entertainment industry honchos, and demonstrate that a trade built around inexpensive, accessible music is the future. Y'know, as opposed to knee-jerk, clumsy attempts to clamp down on piracy and keep things the way there are forever thank you very much.

What do you think about Spotify? Did the change persuade to subscribe or make you stop using it? Pipe up on our Facebook wall, or in the comments section below.

Comments 6

Add your comment

Jakee's avatar

Jakee 19 August, 2011 15:52

"and only letting you play individual tracks five times ever."

Well that's not true. It's that track 5 times a month.

Jaffo's avatar

Jaffo 19 August, 2011 19:48

The 5 times limit is correct. That's the only problem I have with the free version; I don't listen to a lot of music but tend to listen to stuff I like over and over. As a result, I'd rather pay for the odd track from Amazon or wherever instead of renting it for a monthly fee to Spotify.

I'm still using the free version but as my tracks dry up I'll move over to Grooveshark instead, even though it has a pretty ropey UI in comparison.

billfred's avatar

billfred 19 August, 2011 19:49

Is it? I thought it was 5 times for eternity.

Jakee's avatar

Jakee 19 August, 2011 20:52

Strange, I've just had a look, and a track I maxed out (5 times) in June called The Upbeats - WayHey, and was able to play it just now.

Also on the website it states '5 plays/track, 10 hours/month'

olivierm's avatar

olivierm 19 August, 2011 21:35

listening legally to everything I've listened since getting the service would have cost me a fortune. as long as I continue to listen to new music at the current pace, it's a great service for me. So I hope they keep going strong

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 20 August, 2011 23:42

it is ok as long as the artists/industry people earns the big chunk. after all, they do the hard work.

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.