This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Rupert Murdoch blasts Google on Twitter, gets blasted back

News Corp boss Rupert Murdoch has hit out at Google over its Street View data collection controversy.

But the thing is, Murdoch did so on Twitter. And a few people weren't shy of telling him maybe he wasn't best placed to talk about privacy. Click through for the best of the replies.

"Privacy!" Murdoch tweeted. "Google just hacked millions of home computers in UK, presumably bank accounts, fotos [sic] etc while screening streets for Google maps."

Some of Murdoch's followers are up on current events, however, and weren't shy of reminding him of News Corp's misdeeds. @sohailstyle tweeted: "You're preaching about hacking and privacy? I think that's the tweet-joke of the f***ing year!" While @MarkHenty tweeted: "Aren't you in jail yet?"

And those are the ones we can publish.

An hour later, Murdoch tried to clarify. "Privacy tweets not excuses, just raising future of privacy," he tweeted. "Laws seem impossible, look at China and Bo. Why protect crooks and scumbags?"

Google did indeed earn a slap on the wrist for collecting data from home Wi-Fi networks while out and about in its Street View cars. It initially claimed it was a mistake, then it emerged staff knew what it was doing all along, and that it was collecting the data as it "might prove useful for other Google services".

In November 2010, UK data watchdog the ICO ruled Google had breached the Data Protection Act. Then just last week the ICO said it would look into the claims that Google staff knew all about the operations, and may prosecute the company in Britain.

Murdoch only took to Twitter recently, but he's an enthusiastic tweeter. He told the Leveson inquiry into media standards and ethics: "Don't take my tweets too seriously." In January, he called Google a 'piracy leader'.

What do you think of Murdoch's criticism of Google? And should Google be punished by the ICO for its data breach? Let me know in the comments, or on Facebook.

Comments 7

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 3 June, 2012 13:31

They didn't hack people. Google only accessed open wifi networks, if you have an open wifi network your just inviting other people to use and loot at your network.

Jed McInnes's avatar

Jed McInnes 3 June, 2012 14:11

i think many people love google for their 'dont be evil' policy, i just hope they don't forget that...

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 3 June, 2012 19:55

Understandably people who don't secure their networks are inviting these kind of acts of misconduct to occur. But does this really mean it is acceptable. There surely has to be a major revision of Google's policies, and quite frankly highly illegal and immoral acts. As usual though I imagine the big organisations, yet again, will get away with what they have done with barely any backlash. If your house has no lock on the door, does this mean that anyone should be able to just walk into your house and take everything. Morally this is despicable and just proves that a society driven by money (capitilism) allows organisations to get away with anything they want without proper punishment, because money seems to make people forget about what ever happened.

Rodney E Lever's avatar

Rodney E Lever 4 June, 2012 06:28

Isn't it time for the godfather of hypocrisy to mind his OWN business.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 4 June, 2012 07:43

Pot & kettle spring to mind but at least Google had no intention of publishing other people's information.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 4 June, 2012 14:19

There is a distinct difference between accessing an 'open' network and knowingly 'hacking' a password or pin to access a 'secure' network.
Google simply soaked up data that was being broadcast openly by insecure networks whereas NoW et al knowingly 'hacked' into 'secure' accounts.
A big for fine for one (Google) and jail for the other (Murdoch et al.) would be the only 'fair' outcome.

ace9988's avatar

ace9988 5 June, 2012 01:32

Here's a reason why prats like him should have a spokesperson, regardless of the means he uses to communicate with
If i wanted a job for NoW I should just leave a message on my own voicemail, it'll get to them at some point

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.