This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Pierre de Fermat's last theorem celebrated

Fermat's theorem is celebrated by Google today. Pierre de Fermat, born on this day, famously doodled the legendary problem in the margin of a textbook, and it troubled mathematicians for over 300 years.

Fermat was born on 17 August in either 1601, 1607 or 1608. He made significant contributions to number theory, infinitesimal calculus, analytic geometry and probability, and pioneered differential calculus. Yet he was only an amateur mathematician, and his most famous theory was scribbled in the margin of Diophantus's Arithmetica, which he claimed was too small to write his "truly marvellous proof".

The proof, commemorated in today's Google doodle, was written around 1630. It states that no three positive integers a, b and c can satisfy the equation an + bn = cn for any integer value of n greater than 2.

Or as Fermat put it, "It is impossible for a cube to be the sum of two cubes, a fourth power to be the sum of two fourth powers, or in general for any number that is a power greater than the second to be the sum of two like powers. I have discovered a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition that this margin is too narrow to contain."

Fermat never actually published the proof, which remained unsolved for three centuries despite assorted prizes offered for a solution and countless published false proofs. In that time, Fermat's theorem became the most famous mathematical theorem, referenced in The Simpsons and Star Trek: The Next Generation.

Andrew Wiles finally solved the proof in 1993 and tidied up the loose ends shortly after, winning himself a tidy sum in prize money to boot.

Fermat published only one work, preferring to do all his mathletics in letters to other numbercrunchers. He never again referred to his infamous marvellous proof, leading some to wonder if he had actually solved the problem. We might take that approach: hey, we've worked out how to make the ultimate phone, but we've run out of space in this article.

Comments 20

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 10:46

X^3+y^3=Z^3 if X=Y=Z=1
n integer can be any number n

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:01

@anonymous x=y=z=1 ... x^3+y^3=2 , z^3=1 ...

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:05

It works with 0 as well ...

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:05

"X^3+y^3=Z^3 if X=Y=Z=1
n integer can be any number n"

would give 1+1=1, which doesn't work

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:08

2 = 1, aha!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:11

X^3+y^3=Z^3 if X=Y=Z=1
This is not true
substituting values this becomes
1+1=1 which is not true

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:13

haha yeah to the first person its not X=Y=Z its X+Y=Z
so 1 wouldnt work unless to the power of 0 which is less than two!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:14

0 doesn't work as the theory says x,y and z must be positive integers. 0 is not.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:53

It quite clearly states that n must be greater than two.
so all this about n=0 or n=1 is tosh anyway!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 11:58

Hello,

I have just been browsing through this maize of questions and find it V Hard to accept that he....................
Ferment(hope I have spelt it right) never wrote his ( therioes ) down, as well as that, he never put his theories onto a page like this one........... maybe cause it wasn't invented then!!!

Love
and best wishes Marilynxx xx

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 12:08

Marilyn, you're a woman with a big heart and a lot of love to give. That much is clear.

But you're spelling is poor, so I could never commit to you over the long term. Fermat has been written numerous times on this page. You could have checked the spelling against any number of examples.

Best regards,

Dennis J Rodgers

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 12:09

LMAO I don't get it. Who cares?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 12:10

Dude below me...
Are you dumb or something?!
1+1 does not =1

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 12:13

Wiles had a subtle bug in his 200+ page proof. Barry Mazur at Harvard, who reviewed the proof, asked Wiles to explain a particular area wheereby wiles realized he had a problem. It took him 7 additional months to solve that part. Wiles worked alone and secretly for 7 years to prove the theorem. They say that even if he had failed in the end, that the mathematics he developed leading up to the proof was very fruitful

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 12:16

X=1 Y=2 Z=3 n=1 gives 1^1 +2^1 = 3^1

so that works .

But not where N>=2; proving it....? Over to Fermat (or Wiles)

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 12:28

if you read, it says any interger greater than 2

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 13:33

Interesting discussion, wheather 1+1 = 2 or not. You should rather concentrate on taking seriously the ones that they claim they've found Fermat's original proof from 1637. Where Andrew Wiles proof from 1994 took 200 pages (heavily loaded with handwritten proof, now improved to about 100 pages), Fermat's original proof take less than 4 pages . How do I know?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2011 13:45

Pi = 3.16

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 August, 2011 04:04

Great site...

fleabane's avatar

fleabane 23 August, 2011 17:37

You are of course all wrong. Captain Jean Luke Picard (of the Star Ship Enterprise) stated categorically that Fermat's last theorem had remained unsolved for 800 years. I think you'll find that means we've got to wait a few more years.

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.