Windows Phone hasn't made much of an impact since its launch in 2010. For all the praise from reviewers, it's still trailing miserably behind Android and iOS. But with Windows Phone 8 just around the corner, I reckon its fortunes are about to change.
Calling Microsoft an underdog feels about as ridiculous as calling Jupiter a mere asteroid, but that's exactly what Windows Phone is. Next to the goliaths of Apple's iOS and Google's Android operating systems, WP is a drop in the ocean and appeared on just over 1 per cent of smart phones at the end of 2011.
So what's wrong with it? Very little, in terms of functionality. Windows Phone is clean, simple and arguably very attractive. I often read comments by new users raving about the interface and the way it takes the simplicity of iOS and adds some of the customisability of Android. It even managed to tempt our very own Rich Trenholm.
All you need is apps
The problem with Windows Phone is its app store. Both the iOS and Android app stores are chock-full of apps that do pretty much anything you could think of. I won't debate here which of those two are better, but suffice to say they both offer vastly more apps -- at least eight times as many -- than are available in the Windows Phone store.
Although apps certainly aren't the only aspect of a good operating system, they're undeniably a major factor in its popularity. Many apps are now popular enough to be common household names, and so naturally the majority of everyday users will want access to them.
The problem is developers don't want to make more apps until there are more people using Windows Phone -- more customers equal more sales equal more money for them. But us, the customers, don't want to use it until there are more apps available. It's a vicious cycle that's extremely difficult to break, but if Microsoft wants to hit the mobile prime time, it needs to reverse it.
And it just might be able to. Windows Phone 8 is on its way like a runaway train, promising some significant tweaks to the software's underlying architecture that might see the app store quickly filling with all kinds of juicy stuff.
No longer hard to port
A key part of the update will see Windows Phone apps being built with similar core structures to iOS and Android apps, which would allow an existing app to be ported over without having to rewrite the entire thing, saving devs time and money. If you're currently making a hit app for other platforms, you won't need to shell out your kids' inheritance to pay for the app to be rebuilt from the ground up for Windows.
Ideally, apps currently in use on iOS and Android should only need a few relatively small tweaks in order to have them run on Windows Phone. It won't attract developers to build solely for the platform, but it may very well persuade many to launch a WP version of their current apps. If Microsoft can get this right, it'll be a definite ace in the hole for Windows Phone 8.
Perhaps more important, though, is Windows Phone 8's integration with Windows 8 for PCs. Windows Phone 8 and Windows desktop 8 will share the same kernel (the core architecture on which the software is built), which could potentially mean apps purchased through the upcoming Windows 8 app store would also be able to run on Windows Phones.
A market of millions
While this has yet to be properly discussed by Microsoft, it would mean -- in theory -- that Windows Phone developers would immediately have a potential market in the hundreds of millions of Windows desktop users worldwide.
Apple has a similar setup with the iOS and Mac app stores, but they're treated as totally separate entities -- if you buy an app for your phone, you'll have to buy it again for your Mac. If Windows apps could be offered as a one-time purchase, however, simultaneously running across desktop and phone platforms, Microsoft would have a huge incentive for hungry consumers like me to pick WinPho over iOS.
Of course, many apps -- such as Microsoft Office or Adobe Photoshop -- wouldn't be identical on a PC and phone, but if they were built on the same basic foundation, it would be much more simple to build mobile versions, which would keep costs low for developers. If costs were minimal, it would be much easier for both apps to be offered together as a single purchase.
With such a vast potential market, we may well see developers flooding to Windows Phone in the near future. Couple that with Windows Phone 8's support for multi-core processors and micro SD storage and I fully expect to see it posing a serious threat to Android and iOS.
If Microsoft plays its cards right with these updates and allows developers to easily bring their apps to Windows Phone and Windows desktop cheaply enough to be offered as a one-time purchase, it won't be long before the store is bursting at the seams and Windows Phone can become the platform of choice for the hundreds of millions of Windows users across the globe.


Comments 8
Add your comment
anonymous 9 February, 2012 23:58
I like the idea of buying an app once and having it useable on your pc and phone
anonymous 10 February, 2012 01:41
Andrew, let me be blunt. No. You're completely wrong, mostly. The primary factor holding WP back, at least in the U.S., is poor carrier support. Approaching 18 months into WP's release, Verizon and Sprint only have one phone each. Next, it's perception at the consumer end. The younger crowd is totally ga-ga over the iPhone and the 30-50 crowd have a growing bias against MS, so Android is a viable option to iPhones. I'm sorry but tons of WP8 / tablet apps won't in and of itself save MS. IMO, MS should purchase Sprint and start moving towards a vertical integration with four primary cell phone manufacturers: Nokia, HTC, Samsung and ZTE. Yes. W8 will close all of the important gaps, save Siri, and will continue to show, at least on paper, how great WP is. Consumer uptake even with a zillions apps is far from assured.
anonymous 10 February, 2012 04:40
I have the luxury of dual booting wp7 and android. For daily use I leave it on wp7, but for some apps or games I boot into Android. As far as overall user experience and stability wp7 wipes the floor with android and rivals iphone in that department. The issue I see with wp7 is on the physical storefront. I sent my step dad down to get a wp7 device at Verizon after having him play with mine for about an our and explaining all the ways it can benefit him. He came back 2 hours later with a droid ... And he hates it! He told me the salesman at Verizon told him wp7 is completely unstable and glitchy.
After a weeks use all he talks about is how many times his droid freezes, force closes apps, and he has to restart it constantly. He doesn't want to take it back because of the fees Verizon charges to switch phones. If Microsoft wants to turn it around they need to inform and change the way the carriers approach selling wp7 devices.
1000105421 10 February, 2012 09:38
I agree with the previous comment posted at 04:40. I went into a Vodafone shop to buy the Lumia 800, knowing I wanted it, and the salesman there was full of negative comments on the device, and was definitely trying to push me for the iPhone 4S! I don't know what the answer is for Microsoft, but perhaps the opening of their own stores, in worldwide markets will help.
ps: I did buy the L800, and am happy with it, it has most of the apps I want, and apart from a fairly poor battery life, and a lack of front facing camera, it's far more user friendly, visual pleasing and zippy than my previous iPhone.
anonymous 10 February, 2012 17:47
The main thing stopping be buying a windows phone is that wp7 doesn't support any decent hardware. At the moment it only supports single-core processors, come on Microsoft, phones with quad-core processors are just around the corner! Also wp7 doesn't work in phones with a resolution of anything other than 480x800. Also you can't record 1080p video, and it doesn't support flash. Microsoft is very restrictive on the hardware requirements of their phones, this is bad for three reasons.
1) You can't have a wide verity of phones with something to suit everyone, like android.
2) You can't have cutting edge phones with high-res screens, dual core processors, ect.
3) This also means that you can't make and budget phones with a low price tag, as hardware requirements are to high to make a wp7 mobile for around £100.
Also wp7 handsets are too expensive, for example and Nokia lumia 800, single core processor, WVGA resolution, the price of the not-really-anywhere-near-cutting-edge technology? £400, com'on, that almost as much as a Samsung galaxy S2.
anonymous 10 February, 2012 19:42
To the commenter above me, you are stuck in Android land. Windows phones do not require dual-core processors to out-perform dual core android and iphones. Just try one without knowing the processor speed and you'll be impressed. Android requires extra horsepower just to be on par with the other OS's
anonymous 11 February, 2012 10:13
ok, it's me anonymous 10 February, 2012 17:47, again. Even if wp7 mobiles don't need dual-core processors, they'd still be more appealing if they had a higher-res screen, 1080p video and flash. And they still cost way too much, seriously, if they don't have dual-core processors, why do they cost a much as phones that do? What's the point of making an operating system that doesn't need 2 cores to run well, if it then cost as much as a phone with 2 cores?
Alimus 13 February, 2012 11:46
@ anon 2
'you're completely wrong, mostly'
Really?
Seriously though, I'm pretty sure Andrew was referring to WPs success in the UK, as this is CNET UK.