This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Phone shops mislead customers over price hikes, says report

Mobile phone shops are misleading us about the possibility of our phone deals shooting up in price while the contract is still running. That's according to a report by Which? It found more than 80 per cent of shop staff failed to mention or even denied potential price hikes.

Quizzically punctuated consumer champions Which? sent mystery shoppers into phone shops like an army of ninjas sneaking into battle on behalf of mobile owners everywhere. They visited 39 outlets and asked staff if the price of the phone deal they were interested in would stay the same for the duration of the contract.

A whopping 82 per cent of those conversations saw staff give the undercover investigators the wrong information, failing to disclose that the advertised price could indeed rise during the length of the contract.

Many phone contracts contain clauses allowing the network to raise the tariff higher than the price agreed when you signed up. Such clauses are buried deep in the terms and conditions and are rarely spotted by customers.

Not only do mobile phone staff fail to highlight the offending clauses and potential price hikes, Which? reports the majority outright denied that a price rise could follow, even when asked directly.

Four out of five phone networks have raised prices on contracts in the past year. Customers who object are pointed to the Ts & Cs they signed, while those who wish to eject from their contracts are hit with early termination fees.

Such flim-flammery is worth £90m a year to the networks. I contacted them for a response, but at the time of writing, only O2 has responded. O2 says it has "reminded the teams in our stores that prices can always be subject to change", blaming shop staff rather than addressing the questionable practice of signing us to contracts that allow for potential price rises.

Those of us who have worked in shops know what the pressures to sell are like. Whether staff are deliberately misleading customers to make a sale or aren't trained properly by each network, I think the networks are acting in an underhand manner -- enough to prompt an Ofcom investigation, in fact. I mean, let's see how far we get if we all decide we want to pay a different amount each month than what was agreed at the start of the contract.

Have you been screwed over by your phone network? Have you ever worked in a phone shop? Are staff to blame or is it the networks that should be forced to change their ways? Tell me your thoughts in the comments or on our Facebook page.

Comments 12

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2012 17:00

It is an absolute disgrace that consumers are held at the mercy of the mobile companies every whim like this.

I believe in the US it is possible to terminate a contract early if the terms of the contract are changed mid way through (though obviously mobile companies over there aren't forthcoming about this information) to protect consumers from this sort of thing. A rule like this needs to be implemented in the UK as part of consumer protection rights.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2012 17:04

3 put up my contract, only by a bit but as I was 20 months into a 2 year contract I ended it on my old tariff......they tried every trick in the book to keep me but I said it was the principal of it. small print or no small print it shouldn't matter, I expected to pay that fixed price for 24 months.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2012 17:07

Inflationary increases are commonplace. At least the networks dont do it that often. Imagine if a phone contract had a floating price like oil? We'd all be bankrupt in 24 months.

I think the real issue is with networks being sneaky about what constitutes the contract. Is it a core service? Or is it additional? such as when T-mobile tried to limit everyone's data to 500mb (I'd signed up 2 months prior to a contract with a 3gb allowance). They argued a load of nonsense and only backed down in the face of lots of negative publicity.

Changes to contracts should be restricted so consumers and networks aren't at loggerheads over whether or not a change is "materially detrimental".

An increase of £1.50 on my bill was in line with inflation and permissible yet the loss of 2.5gb of data which would have cost over £10 to buy back was lumped in with the whole "additional services subject to change" nonsense.

Inflation sucks but that's not really the big problem with phone contracts.

baeta's avatar

baeta 17 August, 2012 18:06

noo man!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2012 19:31

its been 3 years since I last studied business law in college but if I remember correctly, a contract is a BINDING legal agreement, right? So a contract is not really a contract if the terms can be changed by one party at their discretion. That means if the phone company can increase the price they charge halfway through the contract, maybe I can decide to reduce the price I pay whenever I like. I should have my own "terms and conditions" right?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 August, 2012 19:56

@first and last anonymous. Obviously they can't change the terms, as that would be breach of contract and you would be allowed to leave your contract if they did that. But they're not changing the terms of the contract. Their right to change the price is within the contract that you sign. So as soon as you sign it, they can change the price, although they often limit the extent the amount they will change the price to no more than RPI, or and RPI+ x formula. Most people aren't aware of this, and staff aren't telling people or aware of this, hence the problem and article.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 August, 2012 19:39

read before you sign, thats all i have to say

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 August, 2012 19:45

3 network is charging me £ 2 extra ever month after 10th months of my contract.If i knew they will rise the price somtime then i wouldnt have taken this contract.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 August, 2012 06:38

Join giffgaff or any other sim only deal on the 30 day only deals. If they mess you about dump them & move on. Learned my lesson the hard way with the disgusting ORANGE network.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 20 August, 2012 14:57

Its always cheaper to buy your phone outright and then find the best SIM Only deal to cover your actual usage.

Unlimited deals are nonsense as everyone of us uses an actual amount so find the best value for yourself.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 20 August, 2012 16:55

^^Rubbish^^

An S3 is 500+ offline
My line rental is 30 a month for 24 months = £720 (phone was free)

The exact same plan on a sim only is 20 a month, which comes to 480 over 2 years
Therefore I'm essentially paying £240 for a phone, which is spread over 24 months as opposed to paying 500 quid up front

billfred's avatar

billfred 21 August, 2012 20:03

^^Rubbish^^

Who cares about offline? You can get it for less that £300 if you want to ship it from certain parts of the world. Still even on Amazon and the like it's around the £440 mark. That with £10 a month from GiffGaff. That's £680.

Now yes your deal is actually really great. But it's still a TWO YEAR CONTRACT!!

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.