Ad: Get our free CNET Android app

Microsoft claims it's had Siri for over a year

Microsoft isn't impressed with Siri -- or at least, one of its execs isn't. Chief research and strategy officer Craig Mundie claims Microsoft has had the same capability in Windows Phone 7 for over a year, 9to5 Mac reports.

So how does he explain the massive interest Siri has garnered? Good marketing, but no more than that.

"The Tellme facility has been in Windows 7 Phone [sic] for more than a year," Mundie told Eric Savitz from Forbes magazine. "I just think people are infatuated with Apple announcing it." He said it was good marketing, then bordered on admitting the two voice-recognition capabilities weren't quite the same, saying, "You could argue that Microsoft has had a similar capability in Windows phones for more than a year, since Windows Phone 7 was introduced."

He described how Tellme could transcribe and send text messages as you dictate, and that you can look up things by speaking using the Bing search engine. But he admitted Microsoft could learn a thing or two "on the marketing side" from Apple. "In a sense, many people were disappointed with the newest phone because it wasn't a completely new thing, so the only thing [Apple] really had to hammer on was that [Siri]. So I don't know, maybe we need to pick a feature and hammer on it harder."

He's not the first competitor to pooh-pooh Siri. Google's Andy Rubin criticised it for missing the point of having a mobile. "Your phone is a tool for communicating," he said. "You shouldn't be communicating with the phone, you should be communicating with someone on the other side of the phone."

Siri has so far failed to impress us in the UK, seeing as we can't look up local services or locations yet. That should all change next year.

Are Siri's detractors right? Is it a marketing gimmick? Does it miss the point of a phone? Or are they just jealous? Let us know in the comments below or over on our Facebook page.

Comments 9

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 23 November, 2011 21:02

In the UK, you can use voice with WP7 to look up local services or locations, so in that respect it's better. But it's not as interactive as Siri.

However, Siri requires a data connection for everything, whereas WP7 does not and can do many things without a data connection because it can process some of the voice stuff locally on the phone itself. There are things that Siri can do but WP7 cannot, and vice versa.

So I think there are pros and cons to each. I don't think Microsoft are jealous of Siri, but I think they are right in that Apple made it sound like something amazing. But the truth is that voice interaction is something that Microsoft can easily compete with using their own ecosystem, including WP7, Windows 8, Xbox and Kinect.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 23 November, 2011 22:22

Either the person who wrote this article is a huge Apple Fanboy, or a 13 year old kid.
It's known that this technology was developed before Apple acquired the company who made Siri.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 November, 2011 01:13

I think Apple got lucky with the 4S. I have a big problem with marketing a product feature that's still in beta - it's disrespectful to your customer especially when you charge a premium - though a fantastic marketing cop out when something does stuff up, and sounds better than the infamous steve jobs reply to attenagate when the iPhone 4 was released - "you're holding the phone wrong". It would be nice to think that Tim Cook will be abit more customer focussed then Steve Jobs. But I'm not holding my breath.

Come the iPhone 5 and depending how innovative the developers are with implementing the siri API's into their own app's will determine whether Siri is just another fad - however until then, that's all Siri is - marketing fluff. And the 4S is just a fix. And does that mean one shouldn't get the iPhone 5, 6 or 7 because most likely that version will have flaws that go into mass production?

for the record - i love my macbook pro (circa 2008 pre unibody), i have a iphone 4 0 who uses handsfree dialling, and voice control and after mas os, will not be returning to windows.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 November, 2011 02:18

What's worse is that it's very clear that you don't technically need iPhone 4S specs to use Siri. Apple setup their servers so that only iPhone 4S would be able to use Siri. Now that people have hacked it and got it working on older phones, it proves that Apple lied about the Siri requirements purely to sell the iPhone 4S. That in my opinion is verging on being downright fraudulent. I'm beginning to dislike Apple more and more, but I continue to be amazed that so many people fall for their marketing crap.

Fantom's avatar

Fantom 24 November, 2011 07:40

Apple is apple it's like Ferrari in mobile phone world.Its right size,iOS best,how many crap android phones we have-all same.Apple just works its easy to use.samsung nexus just ugly big.And why all company's trying to copy Apple because they a step ahead of any one.

dirtymagic86's avatar

dirtymagic86 24 November, 2011 09:28

As one of my friends with a iPhone 4S said of Siri..

"Its the coolest feature I never use"

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 November, 2011 09:46

Misleading headline again.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 November, 2011 10:18

they're exactly the same, clearly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHoukZpMhDE

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 November, 2011 13:16

Here is a review that will be disliked by Apple or Android fanboys -

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/story/2011-11-24/windows-smartphone-mango-review/51372652/1

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2012 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.