This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Galaxy S4 vs Lumia 920 vs HTC One vs iPhone 5 vs Nexus 4

Samsung's new Galaxy S4 might look much the same as last year's Galaxy S3, but it's packing a whole host of updates to keep all you Galaxy-gazers happy.

To see how it stacks up against the competition, I pit its specs against the iPhone 5, the new HTC One, the Nokia Lumia 920 and the Google Nexus 4. It's a brief comparison for now, but bookmark this page and check back soon for a full, exhaustive test once we've given it the review treatment.

Design

The S4's design is perhaps the most unremarkable aspect of the new phone. It hasn't been updated much from the S3's look, which isn't likely to please those of you who scorned Apple for being similarly unambitious with the iPhone 5.

Crucially, it keeps the plastic construction -- something of a contentious point for those who argued the S3 felt cheap. Both the iPhone 5 and HTC One use metal chassis, which feel very classy to hold and quite a lot more sturdy. The Lumia 920 uses a solid polycarbonate frame -- a kind of upmarket single piece of plastic -- which again feels more solid than the S3 did.

On the flipside, the plastic frame of the S3 made it very lightweight and the S4 is marginally lighter still. The S4 might be the better option if weight is an issue for you. At 7.9mm thick, it's slimmer than the S3 too and considerably more svelte than the comparatively chubby Lumia 920 and Nexus 4.

The single home button remains intact at the bottom on the front, a feature that prevails on the iPhone as well. The 920, Nexus 4 and HTC One all use touch-sensitive navigation buttons instead.

Screen

Samsung has upped the screen size to a palm-stretching 5 inches, up from the 4.8 inches of the S3. It's only a tiny bit extra, so I doubt you'll notice the difference. The Nexus 4 and HTC One both have 4.7-inch displays, while the iPhone 5 brings up the rear with a much more modest 4 inches. If you want screen real estate to watch video, the S4 is the one for you -- so long as you have huge hands.

It's got a Full HD resolution, which is only rivalled in this roundup by the HTC One. The One is slightly smaller though, so its screen will be marginally sharper as it's packing in the same pixels into a smaller space. I almost guarantee you won't be able to tell the difference though.

Samsung generally has a good record of producing vibrant, bright screens, so we'll have to wait and see which display looks more pleasing to the eye.

Processor

Arguably the headline feature of the S4 is its processor. It boasts an astonishing eight processing cores. That's double the amount you'd find on the S3, or even the HTC One, Nexus 4, or any other top-end smart phone out there right now. It's clocked at a mighty 1.6GHz too, so you can confidently expect it to output some monstrous power. We haven't been able to put it through our usual barrage of brutal benchmarks, but we're certainly excited to get our hands on it.

The Lumia 920, meanwhile, uses a much more understated dual-core processor, which I found perfectly nippy for most tasks. There's not that much you can really do with a Windows Phone that'll stretch it though, so it's difficult to hold the weaker processor against the 920 too much.

Software

Samsung has bundled its new blower with a handful of new software treats too. Its ChatOn messaging service now supports three-way video calling as well as screen sharing -- something we've seen before on the new BlackBerry Z10. You'll also get built-in translation tools for those times when you need to send a crucial email to your German buddy.

There's also a load of gesture-based controls too. Waving your hand over the screen lets you do things like skip songs, scroll through Web pages and answer calls. Waving your hand over any of the other phones will just make you look like a fool. We'll have to go hands-on (or hands near) with the phone to see whether this feature is any use in everyday life.

The S4 is running on the latest version of Android, known as 4.2.2 Jelly Bean. It features Google Now, Photo Sphere, built-in photo editing and a host of other treats. The HTC One uses 4.1 Jelly Bean, so you'll be missing out on Photo Sphere, but everything else is much the same. As a reference device for new Android versions, the Nexus 4 already boasts the latest software and will be among the first to receive the next update, to Key Lime Pie. The others will likely have to wait quite a while.

Camera

Around the back of the S4 is a 13-megapixel camera, the highest number of megapixels offered by any camera in this group. The Lumia 920, Nexus 4 and iPhone 5 all have 8-megapixel snappers while the HTC One has a rather low 4 megapixels. Numbers aren't everything though, as HTC claim its pixels are bigger and therefore better. It didn't impress me much in my review though.

The S3's camera was good, but didn't match the iPhone 5's in terms of colour depth and HDR prowess. We'll have to wait and see if Samsung has managed to up the image quality as well as the pixel count.

To help tip the scales, it's loaded up the camera with a host of features. Drama Shot combines an action moment into one frame -- exactly the same thing as we've just seen on the HTC One -- while Cinema Photo allows you to selectively animate one portion of a scene to create a looping gif. Again, that's lifted straight out of the Lumia 920 and can be done with the Cinemagram app on the iPhone 5.

There are a bunch of other little additions too, along with the usual selection of scene modes. It's good that Samsung has whacked in some camera goodies, but it doesn't seem to be bringing anything new to the table that you can't find on the other cameras. If it wants to show off its photography skills, it's going to need to capture some great shots without relying on gimmicks.

Outlook

The one area the S4 really stands out above the competition is its eight-core processor. It's likely to be phenomenally powerful, but whether that power really makes it a better phone than the rest remains to be seen.

Its software tricks and its camera additions are sure to keep Galaxy fans happy for a little while, but it's disappointing not to see Samsung play with a metal design, especially as swanky metals are in place on two of its main competitors.

How do you think the S4 stacks up against the rest? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below and over on our Facebook page.

Comments 64

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 14 March, 2013 23:59

It seems BlackBerry didn't buy you a big enough lunch to include the fantastic Z10!

Damien2501's avatar

Damien2501 15 March, 2013 00:11

This comparison was done unusually quick. What about the Xperia Z, BB Z10 & some Chinese phones. Hope to see them in the real review.

macu's avatar

macu 15 March, 2013 00:15

No reason to change phones then. I have a Nexus 4 and this doesn't impress

macu's avatar

macu 15 March, 2013 00:16

No reason to change phones then. I have a Nexus 4 and this doesn't impress

macu's avatar

macu 15 March, 2013 00:16

No reason to change phones then. I have a Nexus 4 and this doesn't impress

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 00:35

They seem to have copied quite a few of the new features and apps from Blackberry, Nokia and Apple.
underwhelming and very disappointing really.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 00:50

I don't understand why many people are making out that the processor utilises 8 cores. It's a quad core paired with four extra low powered cores for doing trivial tasks such as email and general phone usage. The high powered cores are used for running graphics intensive games and watching video. When listing specs and comparing phones this is important to know.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 02:13

What about the Xperia Z? Its the flagship so far

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 02:40

Everyone I know that has a Lumia920 will never go back to anything else.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 03:13

well galaxy s4 f***ck the htc one, with that octocore processor, the galaxy s4 price will be insignificant compare to price of HTC ONE

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 08:10

It uses either 4 main cores, or 4 secondary cores.
It doesn't use 8 cores at any time.

Octo-core is really twin-quad cores, but like all quad cores, most of the time it'll be running just dual cores.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 08:19

And the copying continues...

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 08:25

Hard copy photo albums?
Apple have been doing that for years and years.

Other features have been nicked from HTC and Nokia.
Knox is a copy from Blackberry's new OS.

Typical Samsung.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 08:52

lol typical samsung?
There are only soo many times something can be invented.
Photo albums is one thing, I wonder when apple HTC LG etc. copy the dual camera?
The launch of the S4 is just as underwhelming at the Iphone 5 because they are improving on the little things the predecessor does so well.
The S3 is going to be the best phone on the market til the s4 releases in 5 weeks.

I have the S3 (got it at launch) and Im considering buying the S4, but the only downside is knowing samsung there will be a variant in 6 or so months..MAybe with 4Gb ram?
Who knows.
Samsung make too many phones

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 09:55

So, the Xperia Z scores 4.5 yet it's considered less of a big boy than the htc one, that scored less?

This website needs more consistency.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 10:13

Seems we'll have to wait for Nokia to launch new handsets to see any real innovation.

Michael Kaldezar's avatar

Michael Kaldezar 15 March, 2013 10:41

I think the days of real innovation in smartphones are pretty much over and they have just become another commodity like refrigerators etc. i.e. you choose because you like the look,price,brand etc there isn't a whole lot of difference between them anymore. However one area where currently all smartphones fail is battery life....lets see who will be first with a phone that can go for days with out recharging, my old neanderthal Nokia 6310 managed 4/5 days!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 11:41

Android 2.2 O.O

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 11:58

Has everyone forgotten that floating touch was introduced early last year, by Sony, in the Sony Xperia Sola?, they even trademarked Floating Touch, it's nothing new.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:12

@anonymous 15 March, 2013 11:58
It's not just the Floating Touch.
Almost everything on the S4 has been copied from other companies.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:14

Lot of specs and lot of hype...S4 sounds like a killer device on paper..but final verdict will be after people start using it..
Most of the features to me are mere gimmicks just to draw attention...can't really understand the practical uses of these features..
Also whether all these features deliver will only be revealed after the device goes on sale..

Example the hovering and close proximity thing...will the device recognize hovering and supersensitive touch accurately...

Camera may be 13 megapixels but can it beat the Pureview camera of Lumia 920 with OIS

Screen resolution might be 441 ppi but will it hog the battery along with all these software tweaks..

And the worst of all the so called 8 cores..do we actually need all these cores and its impact on battery life..

Also Samsung always tries to pack a lot of features at low cost...so where is the compromise..its obvious the build quality...ask Note 2 and SGS3 users about screen crashes after a trivial falls, poor sound quality and subpar receptions...

IMHO the best integration of superior build and innovation has been Lumia 920 in recent times and will save my bucks for next flagship from Nokia

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:19

After having 10 phones from the galaxy range in the last three years ( three of them being S3's ) I will never buy another Samsung product again. They always seem to have software issues, and software is supposed to be Samsung's strength. There build quality is poor, as well as it's finishing. All three S3's I've used, have poorly made with deformed hardware buttons. And the brushed metal finish is inconsistent looking like it's been done by a twelve year old with a piece of sandpaper.
HTC have always been the strongest Android manufacturer based on the quality of their hardware, and no nonsense software. Trading in my S3 for the HTC on Monday, and I cannot wait to have a phone that does what it says on the tin.
HTC all the way for me.

Kieran Sampson's avatar

Kieran Sampson 15 March, 2013 12:25

I haven't heard this mentioned anywhere so I assume it isn't there, but does it have photosphere being an Android 4.2 device? I know the leaked GSIII 4.2 ROM doesn't. Would be a nice (if gimicky) addition and can't help but wonder that as it's built into Android; why remove it?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:54

The review is incomplete without the Xperia Z.... Do the review again with Xperia Z inclusive.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:55

The review is incomplete without the Xperia Z.... Do the review again with Xperia Z inclusive.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:56

8 Cores? How ridiculous. Or are 6 needed just to run Andwoid these days. Notice you don't say anything about the Uranium/Thorium battery pack....

Seems the Galaxy gets a lot of its features from the Nokia Lumia.

8 Cores, in a phone. Jeez.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:59

Another pocket-busting, silly, over-powered smart phone with gimmicks that 99.9% of users would never use - quite rightly so as well.

Keeps techno journalist busy for a while but it just looks like the whole phone thing has reached the end of the evolution trail.

What does this really do so well that my Samsung Galaxy S2 doesn't do as well or almost as well while weighing far less?

Smart phones are becoming riciulous over-blown and facical now.

Ashiedu Jude's avatar

Ashiedu Jude 15 March, 2013 12:59

The review is incomplete without the Xperia Z.... Do the review again with Xperia Z inclusive.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 12:59

Another pocket-busting, silly, over-powered smart phone with gimmicks that 99.9% of users would never use - quite rightly so as well.

Keeps techno journalist busy for a while but it just looks like the whole phone thing has reached the end of the evolution trail.

What does this really do so well that my Samsung Galaxy S2 doesn't do as well or almost as well while weighing far less?

Smart phones are becoming riciulous over-blown and facical now.

Ashiedu Jude's avatar

Ashiedu Jude 15 March, 2013 13:00

The review is incomplete without the Xperia Z.... Do the review again with Xperia Z inclusive.

Ashiedu Jude's avatar

Ashiedu Jude 15 March, 2013 13:00

The review is incomplete without the Xperia Z.... Do the review again with Xperia Z inclusive...

Howard10000's avatar

Howard10000 15 March, 2013 13:01

Another pocket-busting, silly, over-powered smart phone with gimmicks that 99.9% of users would never use - quite rightly so as well.

Keeps techno journalist busy for a while but it just looks like the whole phone thing has reached the end of the evolution trail.

What does this really do so well that my Samsung Galaxy S2 doesn't do as well or almost as well while weighing far less?

Smart phones are becoming riciulous over-blown and facical now.

Howard10000's avatar

Howard10000 15 March, 2013 13:01

Another pocket-busting, silly, over-powered smart phone with gimmicks that 99.9% of users would never use - quite rightly so as well.

Keeps techno journalist busy for a while but it just looks like the whole phone thing has reached the end of the evolution trail.

What does this really do so well that my Samsung Galaxy S2 doesn't do as well or almost as well while weighing far less?

Smart phones are becoming riciulous over-blown and facical now.

Howard10000's avatar

Howard10000 15 March, 2013 13:02

Another pocket-busting, silly, over-powered smart phone with gimmicks that 99.9% of users would never use - quite rightly so as well.

Keeps techno journalist busy for a while but it just looks like the whole phone thing has reached the end of the evolution trail.

What does this really do so well that my Samsung Galaxy S2 doesn't do as well or almost as well while weighing far less?

Smart phones are becoming riciulous over-blown and facical now.

the1beard's avatar

the1beard 15 March, 2013 13:45

Ah another Andrain mobile ..... yippeeeee NOT>

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 14:16

HTC One .. all the way

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 15:56

Interesting the number of repeated comments for certain rivals. I do wonder how many here actually own and use the devices they support so strongly.
I have done some informal research with people I know who consider a smartphone is essential to their life.
Amazingly most try the multiple facilities over the first week or so of ownership then mainly use them to make calls (really!!) and text, may be emails, access to social sites, plus a small selection from photos and music with a few useful apps eg maps (not iPhone!), news and financial services,
Many feel the ongoing march to "mine is bigger than yours" screens rather pointless. Phones no longer fit into pockets or hand bags comfortably. Many consider a 4.0/4.3 screen is about right. Keep the phones on the contract a further year and use the money to get a tablet to watch movies, play games etc.
So what do I use? Currently an HTC Desire SV which runs two Sims (permitting me to have personal number and business numbers on the same device) which I own and use on different SIM only contracts.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 18:19

iPhone 5 is the best! Samsung spend too much money on researching so called innovation. iPhone is very easy to use, yet never loses sight of innovation and revolution.

 A Non Mouse's avatar

A Non Mouse 15 March, 2013 18:44

@ Anon 12:14. Note II user and no screen crashes after the few tumbles my phone has had, speaker works great and never had any real gripes with reception either.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 15 March, 2013 18:52

@anonymous 18:19 'The iphone 5 is the best' lol that's just your opinion!

Piers Addison's avatar

Piers Addison 15 March, 2013 21:28

8 cores at 1.6Ghz? That's absurdly powerful, even my laptop doesn't have/need that much power.

Ar Sham's avatar

Ar Sham 16 March, 2013 00:35

i think if you've got one of the other flagships from other brands, it doesn't worth it to upgrade your phone but if you have a phone 2 years a good, it would be the best option.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 06:09

Some of the new features are completely crap, such as the smart scroll and pause. Half the video demos I watched shows reviewers having problems using these features smoothly.

And what's the point of having so many cores? The S3 was the fastest on paper at release and from my experience with it it lags A LOT with Samsung's modified android. It just doesnt scroll as smoothly as iphones. Software matters more than hardware when it comes to performance and speed!

Get the Nexus 4 if you're an Android fan, or iPhone 5 otherwise

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 06:18

It's funny to see how idiots going crazy about the 8 cores and don't realise the truth behind it.

Android may offer more freedom for devs, but it's highly unregulated Play store together with phone manufacturer's own bullshit modifications of the OS results in a tremendous task just to run the combination on phones.

Android apps run less efficiently than their iOS or Windows phones counterparts so you're just paying more for better hardwares to run the same usage experience as phones on other platforms.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 06:21

Nexus 4 did a fantastic job with the genuine Android experience.

HTC one is about the best designed Android with its usage of metal.

iPhone 5 is about the smoothest and most polished experience you can get on any smartphones

Galaxy S4? Great if you like a mini tv you can't fit in your pocket.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 10:19

Why is every reviewer obsessed with the phone not having a metal case/chassis? The S3 feels great in the hand and I much prefer it to the iPhone 4s and other heavier devices. The lighter the better!

Dave Phipp's avatar

Dave Phipp 16 March, 2013 11:38

this comparison is pointless, the s3 was better then iPhone so no need to include that and as others have said where is the highest rated phone of the year (Sony Xperia z)? Bin this and start again!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 14:01

Error, you said Android 2.2 Jelly Bean.
It's actually 4.2.2 ;)

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 15:12

i could be wrong but i aways thought that the reason the galaxy phones had plastic back was so that you could remove the back to get to the battery, but ive not played with many other phones so maybe not..

Yanbo Jia's avatar

Yanbo Jia 16 March, 2013 16:16

Just wonder why Lumia 920 was even considered? Because it obviously stands out?

Angelos Bogatinis's avatar

Angelos Bogatinis 16 March, 2013 17:20

It did not impress ... Nexus all the way

Jordan-Findlay 's avatar

Jordan-Findlay 16 March, 2013 18:41

iPhone impresses the most in my opinion however apple no longer have such a lead in the phone competition and the likes of Samsung are quickly catching up. Apple will have to make something incredible in the next phone or risk being overtaken by the other company's.

Loadit's avatar

Loadit 16 March, 2013 22:26

@Michael Kaldezar
Your behind the times my Razr Maxx easily gets 4 days out of one charge in normal use never less than 2 days of higher use. It the longest lasting battery of nay smart phone at the moment.

stevesups's avatar

stevesups 16 March, 2013 23:02

No price? No battery stats? Nothing to buy yet? Damn. Sign me up!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 March, 2013 15:11

it's NOT 8 cores. it's a 4 core qualcomm snapdragon 600,same as the htc one. correct that

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 March, 2013 17:11

It's a Quad core... -.- Stop confusing people, cnet! It can only run 4 cores at a time, thus fundamentally its a QUAD CORE!

Racquel Putt's avatar

Racquel Putt 18 March, 2013 15:45

I have the S3 and would love to have the S4. Can hardly wait for similar updates to the S3

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 22 March, 2013 14:58

Please consider the Sony Xperia Z in this competition.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 23 March, 2013 14:01

I think you're in for a shock. It's a 1.9 dual-core in the UK matey

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 23 March, 2013 16:07

Why isn't there the sony xperia Z?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 23 March, 2013 18:41

So if you haven't had enough time with the device what's the point of this article?.... Oh I know, to get more people to stay on your page. Ok, got it.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 28 March, 2013 18:15

i'm a note 2 user and i don't see any reason to upgrade to S4. I think no matter how good phones are introduced by their company, anyone who buys it will only use the phones features for only a week. after that, they use their smartphones to make calls, text,and social-networking. I use my note 2 to make calls, text, read comics on the internet when i'm going out. I usually use note 2 features when my friends ask me to because they want to compare it to their phones (iPhone 5, HTC One X, or others). S4 is a great phone but it isn't worth it if you already have another galaxy device or any other smartphones.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 4 April, 2013 21:56

What about the fact that it runs on TouchWiz (which is terrible)?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 11 April, 2013 22:01

Have you ever used Nokia lumia 920, I used both Nokia Lumia 920 and Samsung s4. I told you if you ever use Nokia Lumia 920. You'll never use samsung. Challenge!

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

Best mobile deals

Samsung Galaxy S4 »

Samsung Galaxy S4

Phone FREE

£33.00 per month

500 mins

5000 texts

data

3 Mobile 24 month contract

Samsung Galaxy S4

Phone FREE

£37.00 per month

Unlimited mins

Unlimited texts

data

O2 24 month contract

Samsung Galaxy S4

Phone FREE

£37.00 per month

Unlimited mins

Unlimited texts

data

O2 24 month contract

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.