Nokia as the comeback kid of 2012? A year ago, it looked more likely that the formerly dominant mobile maker would have spiralled into irrelevance by that point.
Nokia World 2010 was pretty funereal: the company had a new CEO in Stephen Elop and was still selling plenty of Symbian phones, but the atmosphere among the company's execs and attendees alike was distinctly morose, due to the surging fortunes of the iPhone and Android.
Fast-forward to Nokia World 2011, and it's a different story. Not in terms of iPhone and Android, obviously -- they're still racing ahead. But the air of optimism and confidence has returned to the company. Admittedly, executives bellowing, "AWESOME!!" or shimmying to Shakira on-stage was a quirky way of showing it, but the staff on the showfloor demoing handsets and services reflected the buoyant mood too.
Having purged many of its former execs -- it was noticeable that no-one Finnish got to speak in the keynote session -- Nokia has clearly managed to convince itself that its new Windows Phone strategy can get it back on track. Now to convince everyone else.
The Nokia Lumia 800 in particular seems a very good device. In our short hands-on time we found it solid and stylish, with a good camera (though not best-in-class, as we found in our test) and nippy performance. Meanwhile, Windows Phone Mango is very slick, and offers a refreshingly different alternative to iPhone and Android, even if Nokia exec Kevin Shields' on-stage verbal slapping for phones with "grids of icons" was rather overblown.
The Lumia 800 is a great Windows Phone, then, although the lack of a front-facing camera is puzzling, with Microsoft buying Skype and planning to make it a key part of its smart phone software in the near future. But just like every other Windows Phone, Facebook is integrated beautifully, and there are some good Xbox Live games available.
Just like every other Windows Phone: that's one of the challenges for Nokia. It was noticeable how the Lumia hardware specs were glossed over relatively quickly in Elop's keynote, bar the camera. That might be partly to focus more on the wider branding stuff, but is also probably because the current wave of Windows Phones are pretty similar. So why buy Nokia's model?
One of the most interesting parts of the keynote was the bit on software: how Nokia plans to use its own apps as key selling points for its devices. Nokia Drive has free turn-by-turn navigation, with the ability to store maps locally ahead of time to save on data usage. It looked great, although it looks like matching what Google has on Android with Google Maps Navigation rather than leapfrogging it.
Nokia Music is the second exclusive app for the Lumia phones, with pre-set music playlists to stream or cache locally on the device. It's actually more ambitious than it sounded in its brief keynote appearance, though: you'll be able to create your own mixes by typing in an artist and getting back a playlist of similar songs. It's Nokia's version of Pandora, which is hugely popular in the US. A good complement to having your own music collection stored on the device.
It'll be interesting to see what else Nokia comes up with on the apps front in the coming months, though: there's some augmented reality innovation going on, and Elop mentioned a partnership with Sesame Street to create exclusive apps. If Big Bird can't shift a few Windows Phones, I don't know who can.
It's too tempting to take a quick look at yesterday's announcements and jump to a snap judgement. Nokia is back, Back, BACK! It's going to slay iPhone and Android! Or: Nokia is still doomed! It won't even slay BlackBerry! The reality is that it's too early to tell. The most sensible verdict is that Nokia has at least taken the first step towards regaining its reputation by showing off a decent phone running decent software.
The next step is to sell lots of them. Yesterday's promise of marketing campaigns including "people dressed as tiles running through traffic" is more likely to cause irony-overload accidents with cars steaming into students dressed as Nokia Drive tiles, in all honesty. Big-beat TV ads touting "The Amazing Every Day" could have an impact -- it's at least a better slogan than Sony Ericsson's 'Make.Believe' -- but really it will come down to what networks and phone shops make of the Lumia.
Think of it this way: the race is on to be the phone that shop staff and phone salespeople recommend as an alternative to the iPhone. Currently, that alternative is usually an Android handset, which is why a lot of people upgrading to their first smart phone are currently walking around with HTC, Samsung and Sony Ericsson models. Nokia needs to become that alternative, or at least one of them.
In any case, the company has a shot, which is an improvement on how things felt a year ago. As ever, the wider issue is that the more competition there is between smart phone makers, the better it is for us. Apple versus Google and friends versus Microsoft and Nokia, if the latter pair are firing on all cylinders, should ensure that the pace of innovation in smart phones doesn't let up for some time to come. RIM may yet be the fourth horse in that race, but we'll have to wait to see its first BBX-powered devices to tell.
The Lumia 800 and Lumia 710 haven't saved Nokia: they've merely given it a credible foothold in the battles to come. The fact that we're looking forward to the company's second wave of Windows Phones with genuine anticipation is a sign that it's back in the game.



Comments 10
Add your comment
anonymous 27 October, 2011 19:11
Confused... the previous article which compares the Lumia 800 camera against the SII and 4S informs the reader that the camera is inferior to it's two rivals, and here you are stating that the camera is 'if not, best in it's class'.
Why is Crave always so inconsistant?
anonymous 27 October, 2011 19:20
You've read it wrong sweetie. He's saying it is not best in class - that's how I read it. But it ain't clear. Should have said "though not best in class". Subeditor!
anonymous 27 October, 2011 19:35
I read the poorly worded article as meaning
'the camera is one of the best, if not, the best in it's class'.
But thanks for clearing it up none the less.
Hoodu 27 October, 2011 20:03
No Front facing camera somebody's not done there marketing research again ?Looks like I will have to wait for the windows 8 phone to launch with a front facing camera.Its a shame they missed the present boat as it looks like they are trying a lot harder.There are quite a few Branded company's out there who had the market once then got complacent and promptly lost it.Its a lot harder to climb back up the hill after running head first down it. Way too much back slapping if you ask me.
zioncornerstone 27 October, 2011 23:50
As a techy, this phone and software combined out performs dual core androids and iOS... Why because because the Source coding is much higher quality. Even Symbian Belle is better than iOS5 and Android 4.
All this dual core and 1080p and talk, and LTE talk is rubbish!
Dual core is needed for crap programming such as iOS and Android 4 - 1080p - There is not much difference than with 720p - Even then it depends on many other factors too such as E-prom writing etc...
Joe public are away with the fairies - They have been conned by the PR. Infact a galaxy S2 struggles like hell with flash. Even my little C7 with Anna can handle flash quicker and better than an S2 in some cases. Usually because of it's effecient footprint.
This phone is by far better than any other phone on the market. And Windows as an OS is certainly impressive and fresh - and a change from iSUCK and Android.
I want one NOW! - This is the Rolls Royce of phones - And we know there are not too many of those around!
Nick Hide 28 October, 2011 09:16
Thanks for your comments - 'though not best in class' probably is clearer, thanks.
anonymous 28 October, 2011 11:08
The Lumia 800 does look a very good phone and from all reviews I've read handles well, performs well to very well and has good software on-board. So, it is strange to understand why the limitations on the kit in terms of a) no front-facing camera, b) lack of suitable storage (especially compared to competition and in a world where cloud is not always wanted for everything and c) no Flash support.
Perhaps the reason is not Nokia (as it has the hardware already with the N9) but is Microsoft and waiting for Windows 8 and quite possibly a new, advanced set of hardware specifications.
I hope this is the case because we know Nokia can produce a whole slew of exciting smartphones and the Windows mobile software really can be state of the art. If not, then this partnership could flounder much like WebOS has done: great idea but too little and too late. Let's hope not and, lastly, wouldn't it be nice if Microsoft and Nokia gave us an insight into the limitations in the Lumia model and what the future really does hold?
anonymous 29 October, 2011 01:42
Was so looking forward to this phone.. but, can someone tell me...is the reviews correct when they state it has NO flash support IE 9..... if it is, then it's bye bye Nokia, you haven't listened to your customers yet again, which has got them into this mess in the first place.. I Pray I am wrong.. and we are not looking at the N97 disaster again, which sent their customers running to Android and Apple, and their reputation plummeting .. I want to be a Nokia Fan Boy again! And the most OBVIOUS **** up of all... NO FRONT FACING CAMERA... Nokia.. HELLOOOOOOOO, Anyone there??????
Mark Anderson 29 October, 2011 08:12
It's very sexy and no-one apart from a handful of spods gives a monkey's about a front facing camera. Let's face it, I know one out of 20 iPhone 4 using friends have have used Facetime and he used it... err... once. Total non-issue until video calling over 4G is available and it won't be for a couple of years yet.
anonymous 29 October, 2011 08:42
Mark Anderson - Sorry, your talking rubbish, because it's not just this generation who will use a front facing camera it's everyone that has discovered Skype and can video call via the 3g Network. And 'few spods' were the very people didn't listen to when the N97 became Nokia's downfall... Myself and house-mate, wont be buying it, because of that and no integrated flash support...
This was possibly Nokia's last chance, and it looks like they blew it!