This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

YouView sued over trademark as naming dispute escalates

On-demand TV service YouView is being sued, by a company that claims its name is way too similar to one of its own services.

Telecommunications service Total Ltd registered the trademark for its 'YourView' online customer portal in 2009, and now says that the Lord Sugar-chaired YouView is trampling disastrously all over its property like an elephant in golf shoes.

YouView has already been told by a High Court that its name was "confusingly similar" to Total's service, but Lord Sugar and cohorts seemed unfazed, saying that it had "no intention of changing its name".

YouView is a coalition of the UK's major telly providers, including the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Five, as well as Internet service providers. It was delayed for years but acquired its YouView moniker back in 2010, before which it was known as 'Project Canvas'. Its first product earned a whopping four and a half stars in our review, as well as an Editors' Choice award.

The trademark Total owns is 'YOUR VIEW', but despite having an extra 'r', the Trade Marks Registry said (.pdf link) back in May, "There will be a likelihood of confusion between YOUR VIEW and YOUVIEW," and so YouView was told it couldn't have its name trademarked, at least in respect to goods and services like broadcasting, computer software and telecomms apparatus.

None of that has stopped YouView however, whose ads can be seen on telly and on billboards across our fair nation. Now Total is formally suing Sugar and pals, saying, "Despite the recent vindication of our position in the appeal proceedings we believe that YouView has continued to act without regard to our registered mark and business interests."

The irate organisation continues, "We have had no choice but to issue infringement proceedings and we are confident of success."

Arty Rajendra, a partner at intellectual property firm Rouse said YouView is taking an "enormous risk" by continuing to use its name. "YouView will have to incur significant legal fees defending the action and are at risk of losing the name altogether."

On the other hand, as YouView is trying to launch a new service to compete with the likes of Sky and Virgin Media, losing any name recognition it's earned so far would be a nightmare for Lord Sugar and his associates.

One option could be for YouView to license the name from Total, a solution that would see the British TV enterprise digging into its wallet. Personally I think the names and services both companies provide are different enough that shoppers will figure out the difference, but then I'm no legal eagle.

Are the titles different enough, or should YouView change its name? Give us your view tell me what you think in the comments or on our Facebook wall.

Comments 8

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 November, 2012 17:14

yourview should pay youview royalties, considering I never heard of them until youview was made

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 November, 2012 17:27

Has Alan Sugar ever made or done anything than isn't fundamentally flawed? The guy is a fool.

czechpoint's avatar

czechpoint 26 November, 2012 19:56

This is remarkably similar to the trademark dispute we currently have in Czech Republic where the Czech government registered a government office CzechPOINT one year after we registered the trademark 'CZECH POINT' for our company.

Unfortunately in Czech Republic we don't have as big of a hope of getting justice as in country such as the UK where the judicial system is more independent. The latest is that they had our trademark cancelled: http://www.czechpoint101.com/newsletter/czechpoint/czech-point-political-influence-on-the-czech-trademark-office/.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 26 November, 2012 20:59

No trouble here, no need to pay or change name, there different, totally different. and as said im sure most of the nation has never heard of 'your view'? I think there is a clear name difference, and if you dont your an idiot! ""Herdy Der i thought YouView was Your View Derp""

BLADESMAN1889's avatar

BLADESMAN1889 27 November, 2012 08:50

I'm surprised Alan Sugar didn't see this one coming as the guy seems to "know everything there is to know about business"

Honestly this guy is an arrogant POS whom seems to be blowing his own trumpet now more than ever. He sits there on the apprentice as if he's some kind of Lord believing his own hype.

Oh wait - he is a Lord - but still it irks me when he thinks he knows EVERYTHING about everything.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 27 November, 2012 15:58

nah this is a load of crap especially when then names are different its dumb

mattlad's avatar

mattlad 27 November, 2012 22:40

Sugar:-

YOU'RE FIRED!

saer's avatar

saer 29 November, 2012 12:52

Clearly anonymous bigeyes can tell the difference betweem yourview and youview but is, however, incapable of distinguishing between:
1. then, there and their and their discrete usage.
2. your and you're (possessive and verb).
3. common sense and absence of same

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.