This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Independence Day 3D canned, reports say

The 3D version of Independence Day has reportedly been cancelled, with studios opting to ditch the 3D remake of the 1996 Will Smith-em up. Now that's what I call a close encounter!

Den of Geek reports that Fox is ditching the flick, which was slated for a 3 July release next year. I've contacted 20th Century Fox to request confirmation that the project is hurtling bin-ward, and I'll update this story when I hear back. There are two Independence Day sequels reportedly in the works, though it's not clear yet what's happening with them.

Independence Day, which is famous for being the first film in which Will Smith punches an alien, wasn't filmed using fancy 3D cameras, which means the film would have been post-converted -- a process that involves using computer software to make a guess at which bits of a scene should be in the background and which should pop out.

Post-conversation 3D films often look naff as a result. I've seen a few successful efforts, notably Titanic 3D, though it took 60 weeks and about £11m to make that particular movie work, and I'm not convinced Independence Day would have enjoyed the same careful renovation (think Will Smith's victory cigar waggling in your face).

3D films can make a lot of cash, but it's rare that I meet anyone who's really excited about paying extra to see a three-dimensional flick, and I suspect there are many people out there who would be more than happy to see the trend scrapped.

If a studio scraps a plan to pump out a 3D conversion of a film that earned $104.3m (about £65.5m) in a week, perhaps that's a sign that the phenomenon is on the wane. Don't throw away your dorky cinema specs just yet though -- The Hobbit, Thor: The Dark Worlds, Monsters University, The Great Gatsby, Iron Man 3 and Star Trek Into Darkness will all hit the big screen in triple dimensions, while Jurassic Park 3D (due in April) is proof that 3D remakes aren't dead yet.

There are signs that the tech industry is bored of 3D however, with a number of major companies seemingly switching their focus to 4K, or Ultra High Definition, which is just like HD but with twice as much D.

Will 3D films go quietly into the night? Or are they going to live on? Tell me in the comments below, or on our Facebook wall, but not before watching Bill Pullman deliver his career opus.

Comments 6

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 21 November, 2012 14:14

Just ditch 3D all together. I will never get a 3D TV but I'm sure it'll probably just be an added feature on TV's in a few years. 4K or 8K is what I'm more interested in. I want my TV to have a 300ppi display so we can then stop focusing on picture quality also.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 22 November, 2012 01:54

I don't like 3D much. It's an Unnecessary gimmick. But I enjoyed the movie 'Journey to the centre of the earth.'

- Dexter

Nick Hide's avatar

Nick Hide 22 November, 2012 10:00

*aggressively salutes*

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 22 November, 2012 10:01

3D is every bit as necessary as surround sound or even stereo. Mono works okay, but who would argue stereo is just a gimmick?
I think the real issue is whether the technology works. I look forward to holographic TV and cinema, but until then I admire people who strive to create as immersive an experience as possible.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 22 November, 2012 14:37

3D is just fabulous - when done right. People who dislike 3D (which is fair enough) should appreciate there are others who feel differently and who would love to continue to have 3D versions of films. We don't go on saying scrap 2D and only have 3D movies, right?

If one sees the making of a film shot in 3D and how much thinking goes into it, combined with the science behind 3D, for me it is not a gimmick - especially as it adds to the experience (again for me) - though agree not the same as proper 3D holographic displays, which will come when they come.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 24 November, 2012 11:47

3D only works if it is immersive.

If I move and the perspective doesn't the illusion is gone.

And that's the point, its an illusion of 3D NOT real 3D.
Didn't work in the 70s does not work now.

BUT in games that do follow your movements...... different story.

Pass my VR goggles and I will get my coat.

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.