Ad: Get our free CNET Android app

Brits think 3D is a 'gimmick', survey says

British cinemagoers reckon 3D film is a "gimmick" and makes little difference to the quality of a movie, according to a new survey.

Fewer than one in five (19 per cent) of those polled by market research organisation YouGov said that 3D improves the cinema experience, with over double this amount (41 per cent) stating it's just a gimmick -- which might shed light on the slump in 3D cinema sales

Nearly half (49 per cent) of film lovers said 3D effects in a film make no difference at all, or make it worse. And it seems even those for whom money doesn't matter prefer traditional 2D films, with more than a third stating if 3D and 2D films were the same price, they would be much happier to see the latter.

Over a third (36 per cent) think 3D cinema is just for children, which could be due to recent high-grossing 3D blockbusters such as Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 and Rio, which would tally with the 41 per cent who said 3D films "are not for me".

Perhaps tellingly, a narrow majority of those polled (52 per cent) said they'd be more likely to watch a 3D film if there wasn't a need to wear glasses.

So could the concept of 3D without those pesky specs safeguard the future of 3D cinema? Maybe so, but the integration of 'glasses-free' 3D viewing or auto-stereoscopic technology -- in products such as the Toshiba 55ZL2 -- has so far left much to be desired.

This technology hasn't yet matched the image quality of 3D with specs. In auto-stereoscopic TVs for example, the glasses are replaced by a lenticular lens over the screen, which lowers viewing resolutions and narrows the viewing angle. Even when manufacturers do perfect the art of glasses-free 3D technology, it may be donkey's years before we see it in cinemas.

3D film fans will be pleased to hear that 37 per cent of those surveyed by YouGov do think 3D cinema will still be around in five years' time, so perhaps cinemagoers are just waiting for 3D technology to improve? What do you think? Do you love wearing geeky goggles? Or are you shaking your fists full of popcorn at the screen? Screen your 3D opus in the comments section below, or on our resolutely 2D Facebook page.

Here's a summary of the YouGov Survey findings:

  • Only 19 per cent agree that 3D film improves the cinema experience.
  • Just under half of those polled say they'd be more likely see a film in 3D if it was the same price as the 2D format.
  • Less than a third agreed that 3D is the future of cinema.
  • 49 per cent agreed that the hype about 3D films is a phrase that will pass.
  • Only 1 in 5 agree that going to the cinema is more exciting when the film is in 3D.
  • 41 per cent of those polled said 3D films "are not for me".
  • Over half of people surveyed say they'd be more likely to watch a 3D film at the cinema if you didn't need to wear glasses.

Comments 8

Add your comment

damien2501's avatar

damien2501 29 September, 2011 10:08

I think 3d in Cinema and TV is a gimmick. In handheld devices it seems to add more to the experience, 3D Tablets Laptops and Games Systems seems to make more sense to me. I love my 3DS. It seems that large companies have tried to push 3D and pumped a lot of money into it. Its like a parent trying to get their kid to eat their greens when they really want something else. Except 3D isn't good for you in any way, possibly the opposite. It won't last. Surely there isn't a high enough return from it all. bring on SuperHighDefinition :P Thats what we really want!!!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 30 September, 2011 11:04

I hate 3Dm films. I suffer from constant dizziness and 3D makes it ten times worse!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 30 September, 2011 12:52

3D is so lame. Most films aren't shot with 3D in mind so instead it's layered on top. It just creates a weird pop up book illusion, doesn't immerse you in the space better and the wow factor disappears after 10 mins.

More to the point - my own eyes can perceive depth and 3D - why do I need to have the pole floating in front of me to know that its in the foreground? All that hard work of DoPs that work with composition that gives us artistic depth...*shrug*

It's blatantly there to make more money and what is worrying is that kids are going to think its the acceptable norm to see it 'in 3D'. Leave this trick to those theme park IMAX screenings that were made with 3D in mind!

Naryan's avatar

Naryan 30 September, 2011 16:32

It's a money spinner, the market had nowhere to go after HD so Sony threw itself behind it with all it's might and it's still looking lame as ever.
I loved the way all the other companies jumped on board though. Just the same as with Apple products, except that when Sony sells a crap product, Sony fans know.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 30 September, 2011 17:23

RegardIng this article...

I'm happy that the statistics are published but I thought it was common knowledge that we all thought this.

It's too costly (there are ppl in England who still ant get broadband for goodness sake and that's not a result of poor earnings that's just a digital divide), unrefined and I feel it is a distraction from what matters both in the film industry and technology.

Perhaps this consumer research will be adhered to and companies can finally stop wasting money on a 40 year old concept.

Maybe try again in another 40 years.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 3 October, 2011 10:27

They should replace 3D glasses with 3D contact lenses... although those those wearing contact lenses will have to wear glasses :s

haych

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 4 October, 2011 09:31

me and my wife we personally love 3D. Well, we dont go to cinema but watch at home on 3d projector 120in (cost less than 3d Tv). I can only say WOW!! In my opinion it does make movies better. The movie is an experience, and 3D enhances that experience just as colour or surround sound does. It's not needed, but when done right it adds to the entertainment value of it, it is most definitely not anymore of a gimmick than colour or surround sound is.
it seems that most of the 3D haters havent really seen anything descent in 3D and just dont own the tech. Its probably jealousy, hard to tell.
Trust me, once you have it - ITS TOTALLY ADDICTIVE. i am buying almost every single 3D blu ray and i dont mind paying more because its worth it.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 10 October, 2011 11:14

I'm not that impressed with 3D TV and cinema so far. However, I think it will get better. The 3D imax experience at the NASA Kennedy Space Center is incredibly impressive, even in 'simple' scenes where you wouldn't expect it to add much - it really did. At the moment it's just an excuse to try and get consumers to upgrade their HD TV's and for cinemas to charge more. When my current HD TV dies in 5 or 10 years then it'll probably be 3D, until then I'm happy to wait.

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2012 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.