This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

10 new HD channels for Freeview as Ofcom backs BBC plan

There's only one thing better than high definition -- and that's high definition for free. Telecoms watchdog Ofcom is backing the BBC and friends in calling for up to 10 more HD channels on Freeview.

The BBC, Channel 4 and broadcasting infrastructure company Arqiva want to add 10 more HD channels to Freeview to tempt telly addicts into upgrading their set-top boxes to HD kit.

Why? It's all about airwaves. TV broadcasters and mobile phone networks are squabbling over the same spectrum, because they both want lower-frequency signals that can travel further and beam into buildings.

After some confusion over airwaves during the switch from old-fashioned analogue telly to 4G, Ofcom is looking far, far in advance -- to 5G, the next, next generation of super-fast mobile Internet. The telecoms watchdog already plans to sell the 700MHz frequency to mobile operators in 2018 to carry 5G signals.

The problem is, the 700MHz band is currently used for digital terrestrial TV (DTT) -- Freeview to you and me. Peeved that they'll have to switch frequencies after spending the last couple of years getting people to switch to digital TV in the first place, the broadcasters want to start making use of 600MHz spectrum now to spread out the transition before 700MHz is sold off in 2018.

And so the BBC, Channel 4 and Arqiva propose to use 600MHz airwaves for new high-definition channels to encourage people to buy high-definition kit. If viewers switch to DVB-T2 MPEG-4 Freeview HD receivers sooner rather than later, we avoid a big retune, new aerials, and other such palaver further down the line.

Also on the 600MHz band are radio microphones and smart devices for the home, such as utility meters. These smart devices, known as White Space Devices, need the airwaves to report to your utility suppliers. Your water meter will tell your water supplier, for example, how much of the ol' splashy stuff you're using so you can be billed accurately instead of paying an arbitrary, flat rate.

Would new high-definition channels convince you to upgrade your Freeview kit? Is Ofcom doing the right thing planning for 5G? Tell me your thoughts in the comments or on our Facebook page.

Comments 31

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 17:55

I already have freeview hd and currently watch it more than any of the normal freeview channels. Welcome news.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 18:06

I had already cancelled Virgin Media to go to BT Infinity + BT's Youview package, which will be installed in December.

Extra HD channels will be a bonus.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 18:08

So does that make Freesat the betamax of this generation?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 18:14

Must.. have.. e4.. in HD.. !

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 18:32

Yeah I bought a TV a few months back and made sure it had the freeview HD :) please add more channels!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 19:35

a little of convo but freeview is so much better than freesat

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 20:02

err the point is the new HD channels cant be picked up by current equipment and need new boxes. Then the current freqs will be sold off so all current TVs etc cease to function.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 November, 2012 20:05

where i live in Weymouth Dorset we can only get about 18 freeview channels-Its about time we were given more channels before they start thinking of more HD.come on someone please sort it!!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 20 November, 2012 16:16

Freesat HD has better quality pictures than Freeview HD. Freeview BBC HD channels don't carry text, only subtitles.

lloydmorris11's avatar

lloydmorris11 21 November, 2012 10:05

i have a freeview+ HD pvr and this is great news...but how long do we have to wait for all this good stuff to come???....and when will freeview get as many channels as freesat as it's still a bit one sided when it comes to that....

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 22 November, 2012 01:55

For Freeview HD to succeed, we all need TVs & boxes that put the HD versions at the top of the EPG. (And broadcasters that prioritise them over regional variants in SD). Or at least allow us to re-order them, like Sony.

While Freeview fails to make manufacturers make them, actual viewing of HD channels will remain pitiably low. Have you seen the ratings for the HD channels, buried in the unvisited twilight zone of all EPGs?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 9 January, 2013 22:11

There is nothing wrong with Freeview or Freesat, not forgetting Youview. But what t hey need to do is bring them more together and the online Iplayers should allow access to all channels. The main player should cut a deal with CBS, Movie4Men etc to allow access for their content through their I players..

It is time to start bring the services together in hardware and software, get a central place for PC
and Google TV (very cheap players) to view content live or record.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 13 February, 2013 22:41

Already have freeview ( you view), more HD channels needed

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 27 February, 2013 15:04

Nobody has read it right apart from one! Come c.2018 you won't be able to view the proposed new 10 HD channels unless you buy anothe HD receiver that can tune into the new 600 MHz signals. So, don't get all excited untill you get another box!!!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 17:06

Reply to "anonymous" on 27th Feb.

I think you are the one who has read it wrong! Use of a different frequency is not a problem to an existing Freeview HD box. However Freeview SD boxes - which use an older compression method - will be rendered useless by this change as they haven't got the vital MP4 decompression codecs which are standard on Freeview HD boxes.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 17:08

Reply to "anonymous" on 27th Feb.

I think you are the one who has read it wrong! Use of a different frequency is not a problem to an existing Freeview HD box. However Freeview SD boxes - which use an older compression method - will be rendered useless by this change as they haven't got the vital MP4 decompression codecs which are standard on Freeview HD boxes.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 17:09

Reply to "anonymous" on 27th Feb.

I think you are the one who has read it wrong! Use of a different frequency is not a problem to an existing Freeview HD box. However Freeview SD boxes - which use an older compression method - will be rendered useless by this change as they haven't got the vital MP4 decompression codecs which are standard on Freeview HD boxes.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 17:11

Reply to "anonymous" on 27th Feb.

I think you are the one who has read it wrong! Use of a different frequency is not a problem to an existing Freeview HD box. However Freeview SD boxes - which use an older compression method - will be rendered useless by this change as they haven't got the vital MP4 decompression codecs which are standard on Freeview HD boxes.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 March, 2013 17:12

Reply to "anonymous" on 27th Feb.

I think you are the one who has read it wrong! Use of a different frequency is not a problem to an existing Freeview HD box. However Freeview SD boxes - which use an older compression method - will be rendered useless by this change as they haven't got the vital MP4 decompression codecs which are standard on Freeview HD boxes.

complex1's avatar

complex1 16 March, 2013 17:21

Sorry about the repeated entries - CNet should sort out their incorrect re-enter loops when they say I mistyped the human test words - clearly I didn't ...!!!

complex1's avatar

complex1 16 March, 2013 17:23

Sorry about the repeated entries - CNet should sort out their incorrect re-enter loops when they say I mistyped the human test words - clearly I didn't.

complex1's avatar

complex1 16 March, 2013 17:23

Sorry about the repeated entries - CNet should sort out their incorrect re-enter loops when they say I mistyped the human test words - clearly I didn't.

complex1's avatar

complex1 16 March, 2013 17:31

And also their re-enter loop problem when they say I hadn't met their terms and conditions - clearly I did.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 27 March, 2013 21:17

Interesting stuff....but what does that mean for the SD channels, will Freeview HD just be Freeview HD and just consist of 14 channels?

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 2 April, 2013 15:36

I cannot see the point of Freeview carrying +1 channels of anything.
We can all record so its a waste of space. Talking of waste of space
there are shopping channels as well cluttering up Freeview.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 23 April, 2013 16:11

Whether the change to 600khz goes ahead in 2018 or not that is still five years away. I think most of the people on here want more HD channels now !!!!!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 7 May, 2013 19:28

freeview will be dead by 2020 due to 5g and more space for peoples broad band routers so you all
have bought a lemon and you all will have to go F T A satellite for your tv and freeview wont hanndle
4K ultra hd also that is why freesat was set up for so just get used to it

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 21 May, 2013 20:46

4k signals are useless they are not better definition etc they just added more lines to spread over bigger tv sets you cant watch a 4k on a 32 or 50 inch set the pic quality will be exactly the same to the eye as 1080p ultra hd is already set to fail as its only available in full view on a tv set that is 90 inches or 100 inches wide read up on it before you make comments

and before neg comments im a tv engineer and know all about this stuff lines was added to get a 1080 hd sig across a larger display if you stretch a 1080 to 100 inches it will look terrible like if you stretch a you tube video to a 40 inches lines were added to get the pic sharp

no 32 inch tv set or 50 inch tv set will show a better pic even if it is ultra hd ready

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 21 May, 2013 20:48

so your better off sticking with your 1080 full hd 32 inch or 42 inch sets cause the pic will look the same

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 21 May, 2013 20:52

here is a full guide to what im saying here if people are interested

http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57566079-221/why-ultra-hd-4k-tvs-are-still-stupid/

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 21 May, 2013 20:54

and yes on to the topic i think more freeview hd is great news id like to see all freeview hd only in the future

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.