With apparently no regard for the possibility of creating black holes in the middle of Switzerland, the Large Hadron Collider is at this very moment slamming sub-atomic particles into each other at close to the speed of light. No doubt this is fiddly business, and no doubt the scientists at CERN are some of the best and brightest.
In their lust for knowledge, however, could this intrepid bunch have also created a machine that could be used to travel into the future? In this video we look at the possibility of using the Large Hadron Collider as a time machine.
The newly discovered faster than light neutrinos, particles called Higgs Singlets and wormholes billionths of a centimetre across have all been put forward as possibilities of either traveling or sending messages back in time. However most scientists believe travelling to the past to be impossible, because of the potential for causality paradoxes. That whole 'what would happen if you went back in time and shot your great-great-grandpa?' type of thing.
But one thing that is certainly possible is to leap forward into the future. Or, to put it another way, reduce the speed at which someone travels through time.
Einstein said that the closer you get to the speed of light, the slower time moves for you. From the traveller's point of view, the rest of us move through time faster. And this effect has been observed at the Large Hadron Collider. When fired around the LHC, particles called Pi-Mesons exist 30 times longer than normal, due to the fact that they are travelling close to the speed of light and therefore slower through time.
In fact this effect requires satellites in the Earth's orbit to be corrected for a time shift build-up, otherwise the accuracy of our sat-navs would be thrown off by 6 miles per day.
This is where it's going to get a little less scientific. If you could build an LHC big enough to accommodate a human being, and then propel that brave little time chimp at close to the speed of light, the world around him would begin to speed up, from his point of view, and he would be thrown into the near future.
The very near future, in fact. As our time lord would only travel forwards by a tiny fraction of a second, and the experience would certainly cause his untimely demise. But we never said we would get him there alive.
Ah well, we guess we'll all have to wait a few more years before Android 9.9 Zabaglione rolls round and we can commute to work on our hoverboards.
Comments 11
Add your comment
anonymous 1 February, 2012 10:51
Fun cheerful article! :-)
anonymous 1 February, 2012 12:26
That video was terrible. Really awful mash of ideas.
anonymous 1 February, 2012 12:56
What we really need is a LHC that operates beyond the constraints of gravity ~ we need an LHC in SPACE! Or, perhaps, we can use large objects with gravitational pull (our moon, the earth, or the sun) for that whole time traveling, LCH sled, slingshot around the (insert large object with gravitational pull HERE). That would be good for time travel and/or aerobraking! Oh yeah. ...Excellent article, by the way.
anonymous 1 February, 2012 15:33
The only time travel here is the five minutes I lost reading this article.
anonymous 1 February, 2012 16:53
Even if LHC was in space, it would require an infinite amount of energy to get people to the speed of light, at which point the person would weigh an infinite amount causing LHC to calapse in to you.....that person would be history !!
anonymous 1 February, 2012 17:49
You don't need to go at the speed of light.
Every time you travel in your car, you are "travelling to the futur" (to be precise, time is slower inside the car than outside). Better, if you live in altitude, you are going to the futur slower (try it if you have a couple of spare atomic clocks).
You don't need the LHC for that.
anonymous 1 February, 2012 18:20
So if i stay perfectly still and all the atoms in my body stop moving completely, will i stand still in time ?
peterparkhurst 2 February, 2012 15:41
Funny article, but the video is TERRIBLE and that's the dumbest voiceover I've ever heard. Trying for a Harry Enfield Mr Cholmondley-Warner vibe, but it just sounded like a student with mumps. FAIL.
anonymous 4 February, 2012 17:00
I don't understand what he's trying to say.
Seedcake 7 February, 2012 03:43
This is an insult to my intelligence,and i am not that intelligent?
Marc Ganley 13 February, 2012 11:17
Thanks for all comments, especially those who understood what the purpose and tone of the article/video was.