Interview: Inside CERN with an LHC scientist

Gadgets

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is one of the most ambitious experiments of all time and following a year of shutdown, it's finally started to do its business again. So we thought we'd have a chat to someone directly involved in the experiments to get a sense of what it's like to work in geek heaven.

Dr Paul Jackson is a particle physicist from SLAC and Stanford University, based at CERN. He's working on the Atlas experiment, looking for the Higgs boson -- the so-called 'God particle'. Read on to find out whether he's about to kill us, what would happen to you if you stood in front of the LHC beam and what CERN's favourite snacks are. (Also see our definitive guide to everything you need to know about the Large Hadron Collider, CERN and the Higgs boson)

Will the LHC make a black hole in space that kills us?

"Yes, we might create black holes, but they won't be remotely dangerous. People are getting a bit nervous because scientists have said that, with enough energy, we might be able to create some microscopic black holes within the detectors.

"What this means is that you are creating an object that has the same properties in space as that which is formed when a star collapses, but the difference is that these are very tiny black holes that you create in the experiments and they would evaporate immediately.

"So the black hole would never exist for long enough for its gravitational effects to come into play, so it wouldn't start sucking things into it as it wouldn't exist long enough. There is no way to make one big enough with these collisions to have a dangerous effect on humanity."

Did people from the future travel back in time to sabotage the LHC?

"For me, it's nonsense to say that there are forces coming back from the future to stop the machine from working. It really is just ridiculous to think that is the case. If people could travel forward or back in time, why wouldn't they have done something better or worse for humanity than coming and twiddling around with the LHC?

"If it does destroy the world, there's no-one in the future to travel back in time to do anything about it. It's all a bit Back to the Future really. CERN pull quote 1 It's part of this whole mystery about the machine -- people are willing to believe anything. Physicists sometimes shoot themselves in the foot by not saying, 'We won't destroy the world with black holes,' because they work on probability. Saying, 'This won't happen,' is just not ingrained into them."

What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam?

"You would die. It would be a pretty spectacular death, and you wouldn't know a lot about it.

"We need to keep the beams captured and travelling around in a certain orbit so we can collide them stably. Occasionally, things go a bit wonky and we decide to dump the beams and start again.

"In order to dump the beams, the beam dump has to absorb the equivalent of 87kg of TNT for each of the beams when we dump it. So it would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body."

Are you exposed to much radiation working there?

"Airline pilots and medical doctors get exposed to more radiation than the workers at CERN do. That's why we keep the accelerators and detectors buried so far underground -- 100 metres."

What's CERN's favourite snack?

"People drink a huge amount of coffee, but there's a lot of chocolate. If you come into the control room in the morning, people have croissants. If you come in the afternoon, people have Swiss chocolate."

Have you tried to introduce the Kit Kat?

"Yes, the Brits have tried and it's in one of the vending machines, but it's not going down so well with the Swiss."

It must be a fairly geeky place to work. What does it smell like?

"It smells probably much like you'd expect -- a bit 'games-heavy'. The experimentalists and the theoretical physicists have a different odour. The excessive amount of soft cheese in the area doesn't add to the spring-time freshness of the site."

Are the people who work there into games?

"There is definitely a big gaming contingent, with a lot of talk of Dungeons and Dragons. There's a lot of roleplaying, World of Warcraft and console games, and there are those that balk against that because they don't want to appear to be so geeky."

What operating system do you all use?

"A lot of it is Linux-based for the actual control-room infrastructure stuff. There's a lot of coding that's easier to do in Linux, there's a lot of Java applications for the visuals. Operating system-wise, there are a lot of people preferring to use Macs rather than Windows."

Do you have an alarm that goes 'AWOOGA!'?

"Like John Fashanu on Gladiators?"

No, a red flashy alarm with a Klaxon.

"If you're in the tunnel, I think there's one of those, but in the control room, there's more voices and things that start blinking."

What was your first computer?

"Commodore VIC-20. Good times -- I well up when I think about the tape drive sometimes. My favourite game was a little scrolling, spaceship-shooting game, but the playability was fantastic. I could play that game for years and not get bored. I have never been able to find a game better than that."

CERN pull quote 2

What's your typical day like?

"I tend to arrive at 9am, with lots of meetings and then working at my desk, essentially typical office work. The other part I spend in the control room checking up on operations and making sure the things I'm responsible for are still working.

"On days like we've had recently, you have periods when you have to do shift work, where you do an 8-hour period in the control room. We are basically monitoring parts of the detector, turning things off that make it look like they are not working properly and debugging things offline.

"You can be doing the graveyard shift from midnight until 8 in the morning, or you can be doing the day or evening shift. Those throw your normal schedule off and we end up working pretty long hours."

What is the CERN culture like?

"The main thing is trying to talk to the people that can help you get to the bottom of the problem you are working on as quickly as possible, so you end up having a lot of cups of coffee and a lot of chats. You get a lot done that way."

What are the main experiments?

"There are two experiments -- Atlas and CMS -- which are multi-purpose discovery experiments. They are both looking for the Higgs boson. They are also trying to discover the possibility of what's called supersymmetry -- a different symmetry in nature that would open up a whole new suite of elementary particles that we haven't yet measured."

How likely is it that you will find the Higgs boson?

"I'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent. From a physicist's standpoint, if you don't find that it's almost more interesting, because it means we got it wrong and there is other stuff going on we don't understand."

If you don't find the Higgs boson, is that it for the standard model?

"The standard model works perfectly; the Higgs mechanism is tacked on to the standard model. It's a way of saying why the masses of all the particles are different. In the standard model, all the particles are massless. The Higgs mechanism is a means of generating mass for particles.

"So if there isn't something like the Higgs mechanism to make particles heavy, then there's got to be something else that does it, because we measure them and we know they're heavy.

"But the standard model will still be correct with its explanation of all the ways which particles decay and interact as the measurements all fit superbly into this model, but there is this missing piece as to why things are heavy that the Higgs mechanism will hopefully answer."

What have been your high and low points of working here?

"My high point was last September when we first got beams in the LHC. Everyone was very excited, and that lasted just over a week. It's not been built up as much this time, and there's a higher expectation that things are working well and there won't be another major catastrophe. My low point was earlier this year when the LHC had shut down and I was starting to get a bit fed up with physics."

What language do you all speak?

"The official languages of CERN are English and French, but it depends which group you're working in. There are around 3,000 physicists. You get an awful lot of German, Italian, plenty of Spanish, lot of Japanese, Russian, Australian (because that's not really English). There are people from all different countries and it's very common for physicists to speak more than one language."

CERN pull quote 3

How do you get around?

"There are CERN bikes and cars you can borrow, but a lot of people drive their own cars to their own experiments."

What do you think of the coverage the LHC has had in the media? Do people understand what you're trying to do?

"In general, it has been very positive. I don't think you can belittle how many people now know what an elementary particle is or what a collider is or what a Higgs boson is than did a few years ago.

"CERN is still a mysterious place to most people and a lot of what goes on is over people's heads, so they tend to glorify the bad points more than the good points. In general, the coverage of the start-up last year was fantastic and the coverage of the shutdown over the past year has become, rightly, increasingly negative. Now it's back up and running, I think people are generally pretty excited about it."

What's it like to do this kind of thing?

"It's great fun. You work relatively long hours, but you can pick your hours and take your holidays whenever you like. You don't get paid badly and the work is really interesting.

"You get to define your own involvement in the experiment you're working on. If you come up with an interesting idea that no-one has thought of and you convince the right people, you can do that and make a career out of it. That's why most people don't mind being at work most of the time."

Has Twitter and Facebook impacted your professional world much?

"They make it much easier to disseminate information. We have working group Facebook pages for the Atlas experiment and CERN was updating its Twitter feed constantly when beams were being put back into the machine a few days ago. It gives you the opportunity to stay in touch with people in a very easy way."

Is there a robot dog like Battlestar Galactica's Muffitt at CERN?

"If there is, I haven't seen it, but you can't rule these things out."

Paul Jackson in control room

Comments 38

Add your comment

Rich Trenholm 27 November, 2009 12:02

Fascinating stuff

anonymous 27 November, 2009 14:12

DEATH BY STUPIDITY
Einstein said '2 things i deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man'. He also explained us what mass is: a hurricane-like vortex of spacetime which according to his principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, attracts more the faster it turns. Nobel prize wilczek and myself in my work on fractal Universes showed we can find the mass of all particles by considering the frequency of those vortices. But quantum physicists wouldnt accept Einstein nd when he died tried to promote absurd theories like the 'higgs' particle which nobody knows how can give 'mass' to every other particle of the Universe if it is invisible, if particles colliding repel... But Einstein was a lonely genius and quantum physicists were doing Nuclear Bombs and Atomic cannons (LHC is aquark cannon but in orwelian neolanugage now this industry has been privatized after the cold war nd). Plainly speaking we do not need this Damocles machine, a 13 billion $ hoax who prevents the expansion of true science, denies Einstein's work and will produce black holes and Einstein's quark condensates responsible for nova explosions. But a marketing campaing has convinced mankind with the hype of replicating the big-bang of the Earth and find the absurd Higgs particle that Nobel Prizeweinberg called the toilet particle to be flush in a vortex of mass of Doctor Einstein as the Earth will be this christmas. We will indeed die of infinite stupidity, because a extinct species nows nothing=0 and Knowledge/0=Infinite stupidity. Einstein also said 'those who pretend to impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods'.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 14:22

Now this cern kid tells us that black holes will evaporate 'back to the past' according o another absurd theory of quantum Hawking which says 'Einstein is double wrong'. He nevver was proved. Einstein's theory of black holes thus stands a standard science and his black holes never evaporate but absorb mass in an inverse nuclear bomb: M=E/c2, regardless of size as the essence of relativity is precisely that size doesnt matter. Quantum gurus pretend that because somthing is small it will obey quantum laws which is utter nonsense as a small ant doesnt obey the laws of bacteria but those of ants. Wht matters is that black hoels are mass/gravitational entities and will obey Einstein's laws.
Th4e same guy though says below that 'travel in time doesnt happen'. So Mr. Hawking's musings that blck holes are time machines and evaporate back to the past are absurd according to this cern kid. He is contradicting itself.
So what will happen? Simple, black holes will appear and eat the Earth. It is worth to die to show that Einstein was right? Of course not. Why politicians do nothing? Why the press dont denounce the first potential genocide of the human species? Do a species of infinite stupidity and arrogance deserves to live?

Flora Graham 27 November, 2009 14:25

"The experimentalists and the theoretical physicists have a different odour."

Genius.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 15:11

I was very irate about this article and began typing with the intention of proving why you are all wrong and why the LHC will indeed create black holes, but then I fancied a cup of tea, so I had a nice sit down and a biscuit and now I feel a lot better about the whole thing.

TheConsumer 27 November, 2009 15:24

erm,.... the whole point of science is to explain things, anything. These explanations (theories) have to stand up to testing/criticism and if they don't we try again for a better result. ALL theories can be amended and updated to integrate changes in thinking, technological developments etc etc, whether or not the Higgs is found the rest of the discoveries they will make @ CERN will be fascinating. (If the Higgs is found and we have some idea of how it works and can control it, space travel outside our solar system might actually become a viable proposition (artificial gravity)- but we'll all be long gone by then, so stop bitchin' and leave the men in white coats n black rimmed specs to it!)

menhel 27 November, 2009 15:54

This dude used to come to my school/sixth form 10-15 years ago(I think). He actually popped in the other day and talked a bit about particle physics, all very interesting. He even has a swiss bank account!! I've even been lucky enough to actually be in the control room with all those screens are last month. The room is immense with 2 beasty projectors. I guess there is a slight advantage if you do Physics at A Level.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 17:34

blue shirt, beige pants, black shoes... it truly is geek heaven down there.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 17:47

I simply love new articles like this for two reasons:

1) The material in the article itself is dumbed down enough for someone like me to enjoy the wonderment of science without being too taxing on my brain.
2) The schitzophrenics who reply to the article with their absurd theories or commentary. Who ever thought quantum physics could be made funny?

anonymous 27 November, 2009 17:57

higgs Bison = 42

anonymous 27 November, 2009 18:42

Einstein was an utter douchebag.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 18:48

Funny how we need the largest machine to find out info about the smallest particle.. still wondering if they'll find Whoville on that speck.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 18:57

You, sir, are a big, kooky nut-case! Where are your peer-reviewed papers for the world to read? On your big, kooky, nut-case web site? URL please.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 20:33

I want to know why more people aren't freaking out over the black holes WHICH WILL EAT OUR ENTIRE PLANET!!! It WILL happen!!! WHO will STOP them!!!

The only thing even close to this scary is the Yellowstone Super Volcano. At least with that, the entire Earth won't disappear.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 20:41

but doesnt size matter? dont the laws of relativity get all hinky at the subatomic level? especially since elemental particles have such small mass that gravity is extremely weak on the subatomic level? im no physicist, but from what i've read, these subatomic black holes are theoretically posible, not provent to exist, and by the same theories that posit that they could exist, would be too unstable to exist for more than a planck unit of time.

anonymous 27 November, 2009 23:25

Such a nice perspective, getting a peek at how things are done where smart and responsible people work: relatively flat organisation, quickly getting together a team to get solutions going, scientists enjoying their work. Beautiful.

anonymous 28 November, 2009 08:55

In point of fact, many physicists have already pointed out that ultra-high energy cosmic rays have been crashing into the upper atmosphere with many orders of magnitude more energy than those produced at the LHC. So, if the production of micro black holes were a problem, the earth would have been eaten up long ago.

anonymous 28 November, 2009 12:44

Hey ... well black holes start to appear as particles are near speed of light right? Soo acclerator is providing speed and if black hole do appear it'll consume CERN and particles will loose speed as acclerator will be broken... I wonder what s gonna happen with a beam...

anonymous 28 November, 2009 16:46

you seem to have ignored the LHCb experiment trying to answear why the universe is made of matter. (Far more important then why should it have mass)
Also there is Alice which is trying to do more experiments again but with lead ions to make super huge atoms the size of molecules.

Black holes won't happen, and the largest unusal thing is that measuring the higgs boson is just highly improbable... (I'm sure marvin would have something to say on that)


Anyway, I'm off to CERN tomorrow so I can enjoy watching the world freak out over some media hyped nonsence :D :D

anonymous 28 November, 2009 18:17

I like the "Easy Button" he has on his desk.

:-)

anonymous 28 November, 2009 18:36

I can see hat there are some people who just didn't make it in their field and criticisize what others do with tremendous signs of envy. Although I do agree that strng theory is overated and that big science is not helping some new and interesting ideas, proofs are proofs and in science in the end, that's what counts. Weird ideas, if they don't come with real sustent, are not scientific ideas.

anonymous 29 November, 2009 02:36

People who claim this experiment will create black holes have still not explained how neutron stars manage to exist despite the exact same sort of collisions occurring on their surfaces all the time. If they were right then any neutron star would collapse into its own self-generated black hole as soon as cosmic rays struck its surface. So why do I still see all these rapidly blinking dots in the night sky where there should be nothing?

anonymous 29 November, 2009 09:52

It used to be that you could understand the standard model in about 5 minutes. You know, electrons orbiting a nucleus. But it's been fixed so hard now and is so bizzaro that my 5 minute attention span is exhausted before even understanding symmetry..

anonymous 29 November, 2009 15:05

Is it possible that a collision can result in the creation of a new, super-stable particle?

(recall the smashing together of Neo and Smith in the Matrix - the idea exists)

anonymous 30 November, 2009 11:26

Everything that I have read about black holes states that they are not sustainable at the mass that will be produced between two particles. An overwehlming majority of scientist today, right now say the same thing.

Come on guys! The beliefe of everyone on this page is inverted to the beliefs of the scientific communtiy. Very interesting. People do you just like drama is that the reality of the situation?

siarad 30 November, 2009 18:44

People seem to be saying any Black Hole has massive gravity.
Standing here I weigh about 1000N coz I'm a long way from most of the Earths gravity.
Compress the Earth to make it a BH & apart from it being hard to balance I'd weigh a lot more coz I'm closer to all the gravity, the same unchanged gravity.
There's no more gravity & the Earth would continue circling the Sun as would all else, nothing will have changed or been gobbled up.
So if an Earth sized BH is no problem I don't see how a couple of lead molecules colliding will produce anything dangerous.
Are people saying energy of 87kg can produce gigantic amounts of gravity when all else around the Universe seems to point to gravity neither being destroyed or generated.
I'm no physicist nor did I do physics at school & the above just seems approximately how it is to me.

anonymous 30 November, 2009 20:43

The chances of finding the Higgs boson are nil. The Higgs boson is merely an intellectual concept - an idea meant to plug a hole in a theory so that scientists could continue their mental masturbation, as if the hole in their theory didn't exist. But they will gladly spend billions of dollars looking for their fudge factor because the alternative is to admit that their theory has a serious problem and they may be on a completely wrong track.

anonymous 30 November, 2009 21:07

Yes, people do just like drama... If the earth isn't immediately swallowed up by a black hole as soon as the LHC his full speed / engergy, then they'll just go on believing that the black hole is falling down into the center of the earth and that it'll take till 12/21/2012 before its able to visibly swallow everything up!! ;-)

anonymous 30 November, 2009 21:09

Yes, people do just like drama... If the earth isn't immediately swallowed up by a black hole as soon as the LHC his full speed / engergy, then they'll just go on believing that the black hole is falling down into the center of the earth and that it'll take till 12/21/2012 before its able to visibly swallow everything up!! ;-)

anonymous 30 November, 2009 22:54

Coming from an advanced civilization as I do, from a planet far far away, it laugh me make to observe arguments you having such elementary grade questions of existence. Answers be upon you when so to you will laugh, or maybe complain, that so simple it all was. Interstellar space flight just around the corner is, brought to you by Coke, the interstellar taste.

anonymous 30 November, 2009 23:05

I have to marvel at those who think that man is going too far with these experiments; micro black hole creation and such. We already possess atomic weapons, yet your average LHC nay-sayer is more concerned with LHC experiments than with the these weapons of mass destruction. Two things: If the nay-sayers are right, I'll permit myself to be subject to the full wrath of their "I told you so." Second, If a black hole of sufficient mass forms and engulfs the Earth and local neighbourhood of stars, I'll have the bragging rights to say that I was killed by a black hole. Who wouldn't think THAT was totally cool?

anonymous 1 December, 2009 00:29

No one will... we will be dead before someone can say "cool." It makes you think... I wonder if all black holes are produced by some sort of a "man-kind," and this is "God's way" (whoever that god may be) of ending life and starting back over again. In any event, if it truely does make a black whole that wipes us all out, at least I can say before I die that I lived in the end times, and I will try and steal a Ferrari or a Lambo and go on a joyride before I die. Well, I must be leaving. I'm not high enough yet.

anonymous 1 December, 2009 04:17

THERE IT IS! The third to last comment comes from another planet or the future. I can't believe it took that long.

anonymous 1 December, 2009 06:23

Those of you who are crying that this experiment should be stopped, just shut up because you sound stupid.

Collisions of this energy regularly occur with cosmic rays. Nothing dangerous will happen here.

anonymous 1 December, 2009 15:17

Some very enlightening comments and some not so.... But no one mentions the Upshinad Vedas or the Vedhic writing ( including the Bagvat Gita, the Mahabharata, or the Ramayana) they all mention the concept of enormus energy and the power of the 'cosmic' particles... It may be myth but it was thought of many many years ago...Dont stop the experiment please.It is our 'god' given duty to search and find out where we came from who we all are and where we are heading....Good luck in this quest for the sake of mankind....The financial cost does not come in to it at all considering what the USA and the allied forces are spending and have spent to date on the invasion/regime change in Iraq and the deployment of troops in Afganistan...CIAO.

anonymous 8 January, 2010 19:31

A black hole consumes everything and grows bigger, that was explained to us all at school.
Why build this machine underground, and if im correct are we not coming nearer to a polar shift as the earth does every 26.000 years. Then there is the milky way and where we will be placed in 2012, questions need awnsers but the truth would be a great start. I ask everyone to do theie homework so that this message is not deleted.

anonymous 2 April, 2010 23:37

boink!!

anonymous 18 April, 2010 13:30

I am speaking on behalf of the public that I have spoken with, to any of the scientists working at the LHC:

1) Is it true that the exact same collisions you will produce already occur in the atmosphere of Earth? That the LHC is just to be able to create them in a spot that you can have monitoring equipment set up to study them?

1b) If these collisions already occur naturally near Earth, as has been said in order to calm fears over a black hole disaster, then do they routinely create "mini-black holes" or not? Statements coming from the LHC say these collisions "may or may not" create them.

1c) If these collisions really do occur in Earth's atmosphere, and that is the example that the LHC gives to calm people's fears over black hole formation, then the energy of those naturally occurring collisions should not be exceeded.

2) No one has ever documented a "miniature" black hole before. According to some theories, once formed, a black hole does not go away. It is possible that all black holes are a rip in space-time that is permanent. Can someone please explain Hawking Radiation related to the "miniatures"?

3) Simply out of respect for the people of the world who are worried about the end of the world, could we make sure the LHC is shut down for December 21st, 2012, and shut down for the months before and after that date? Also this would be respectful to the ancient Mayan astronomers who, by my understanding, could figure out more about the universe than modern day scientists if they were using only stone age technology. I have seen video of scientists from the LHC scoffing the Mayans calendar when it is interpreted as a doomsday countdown. That seems to be a close minded point of view.

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

  • Login
  • Register

Will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use