This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To find out more and change your cookie settings, please view our cookie policy. Close

Confessions of a former booth babe

Another tech show, another fracas over sexism. The offending company this time was Asus, which caused a minor hoo-ha when it tweeted a picture of a booth babe from the Computex show in Taipei last week with the caption: "The rear looks pretty nice. So does the new Transformer AIO."

Doesn't it make you want to do a great big sigh? You know how this could have been avoided? By not having booth babes at all, that's how.

But hold the phone -- this was hardly the fault of the attractive woman pictured, it was all down to the social-media monkey who sent the tweet. No one, it seems, warned the poor, potentially now unemployed fool that sexism is the metaphorical elephant in the gadget-filled convention centre.

Before I go on, there's something I must confess, a little secret I must share with you: I used to be a booth babe myself. It wasn't for long mind, and I was working as an established member of a company's marketing team, rather than just as hired help, but I've done the lot -- everything from the sheeny shiny Gadget Show Live to grubbier trade-only trade shows.

I've spent more time than any human should have to pacing 3x3m cells at ExCel, Earls Court and the NEC, smiling, flyering, demonstrating and being subjected to the terrible music taste of my neighbours (*cough* Virgin Media *cough*).

There are those of you who might already be judging me, or maybe just silently goading me for taking liberties with the word 'babe', but despite what the modern, forward-thinking chaps at CVG might have you believe, booth babes aren't a separate sub-species of woman who are ripe for objectifying, regardless of what they might or might not be wearing.

I can empathise with aspects of Michael Kan's 'day in the life of' article on ITWorld.com last week, which provided rare insight into what it's like to be a booth babe. Nine straight days of stalking a convention centre floor without letting the smile slip from your lips can indeed be tiring at times.

The story that really filled me with dismay, however, was the woman who was disillusioned by the sexism she faced -- and increasingly tiny garments she was expected to wear -- and was leaving the industry to take a new job as a product manager at a biotech company. It makes me sad to think whoever employed this clearly capable young woman didn't have the smarts to realise she had more than her body to offer.

For the record, I'd like to let it be known that just like the lady in Asus' twitpic, I did wear clothes -- jeans and a polo shirt, sometimes with a cardigan -- and I wasn't the only one either. There are always plenty of us around, booth babes with clothes and genuine marketing responsibilities, and while an abundance of garments shouldn't be required to protect us from the threat of sexism, in reality it kind of does.

I was never knowingly on the receiving end of any misogynistic comments, neither did I feel patronised or like I was being overlooked in favour of my male counterparts (booth boys?). My employer respected me, and never treated me as if I was a mere human display unit.

My colleague Natasha Lomas addressed the culture of booth babes earlier this year when the CNET team received an invite from Microsoft to attend a burlesque party at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. She made the point that when it comes to semi-naked ladies, it's all about the context. The problem isn't the presence of booth babes at trade shows, but the hypersexualised version of femininity that many brands are pushing while promoting their products, which only serves to reinforce the notion of the tech industry as a male-dominated space.

There could well be boardrooms and development teams full of women squirreled away in Silicon Valley, but what use is that if the women representing the public face of a company are openly dismissed by their employers as little more than tinsel-toting totty used to bait a presumed audience of straight men into taking their flyers and photographs?

It's not only the tech industry that's guilty of enlisting scantily-clad promo girls, but it needs to recognise it's never going to tackle its gender imbalance or encourage a culture of respect by consigning women to small talk, smiles and uniforms picked out from the Ann Summers costume range.

The industry also needs to adapt its marketing to a changing audience -- and I don't just mean in the context of trade shows. As The Atlantic reports, Intel researcher Genevieve Bell has recently discovered that women are the primary adopters of new technology, as well as the vast majority of owners of all Internet-enabled devices.

My own experience would support this -- it's a generalisation, but while most of the men I spoke to at tech shows were interested in the concept and innovation behind the technology, it tended to be the women who asked questions about practicalities and purchasing.

Tech companies should be flooding their booths with babes women -- we have as important a role to play there as anywhere else in the industry -- but they should also give them proper product knowledge, genuine responsibilities, possibly some sensible shoes and, most importantly, a little respect.

Comments 23

Add your comment

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 June, 2012 10:53

Unfortunately this mindset is rife in the graphic design industry as well. Spend any time looking for a premium WordPress theme and what do you find: scantily-clad "babes" all over the place - on Jquery sliders, in post previews, in the portfolio. Spend any time looking for a Photoshop tutorial on YouTube and it's just the same: a voluptuous young woman is just the thing to demo the cloning tool. There seems to be no sense that there might be something wrong with this. We are the FHM generation, after all.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 June, 2012 14:08

lol get over it lady, booth babes dress the way they do to be oggled by men its what there bloody paid for.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 16 June, 2012 22:33

"lol get over it lady, booth babes dress the way they do to be oggled by men its what there bloody paid for."

Er, no. They dress the way they do, so that the men will oggle at the tech they're presenting.

These marketing departments follow the same philosophy as they do in print and TV advertising: the female form -- breasts, bottoms and legs in particular -- will sell just about anything.

Marketeers are not stupid -- they know exactly what they're doing. The consumer, on the other hand...

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 June, 2012 07:34

This site is going down hill!

Stick to tech news not politics!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 17 June, 2012 14:23

I love a bit of T&A dolling up my tech

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 09:51

I'm confused as to how this is sexist? Some men CHOOSE to objectify women, the same way women like to objectify their favourite hollywood actor or boy band member (one direction anyone?). Tech shows use girls to present their products because it's nicer to look at than a 50 year old fat guy. Women, get over your phobia of men. The majority of us aren't douche's. If you feel like you're being objectified... DON'T BE A BOOTH GIRL.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 09:53

It's kind of a double edged sword isn't it? On one hand they want men to be attracted to women (well most women do), but on the other hand they scream "SEXISM!" when that selfsame motivation is used to sell products. It is primal to the male animals nature, that's what makes it effective. And using what is most effective is what marketing is all about. So until men stop being attracted to women (and the whole world is gay), women will be used to get men's collective attention and sell to him.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 10:52

FFS, did I miss the email again. When was it decided that I'm not allowed to find females attractive? Or is it that I'm just not allowed to tell others that I find females attractive. Newsflash, pretty ladies like to be told they look pretty. Is it sexism that a pretty lady can draw a larger wage than me by taking off her clothes? Too right it is but I can understand why nobody wants to pay to see my hairy A in skimpy clothing. So good luck to all the young ladies that want to exploit us men and just like the Youtube videos with cleavage in the thumbnails, the marketing companies know exactly what makes (most) men tick. If anyone is asked to do something against their personal ethics, they are more than capable of saying "No." and going to work for a company that better fits their ethics. Sorry, rant over.

Natasha Lomas's avatar

Natasha Lomas 18 June, 2012 12:16

@anonymous 18 June, 2012 09:51 You're missing the point Katie's making. Tech companies need to sell to women as well as men -- and scantily clad ladies aren't going to help them do that. Quite the opposite in fact -- they alienate women from becoming more involved in the industry. Making sexist comments that objectify women -- or hiring women to act as uninformed s3x objects simply to attract male eyeballs -- is as lazy as it is brainless. It makes these companies and their products look much more stupid than they (presumably) are. Tech companies need to grow up and start having an intelligent conversation with women -- or they are ignoring and annoying a huge chunk of potential customers. Indeed, as Katie points out, the majority of users of many digital services are already women -- exactly the people this sort of brainless, lazy marketing will fail to reach

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 12:58

The Culture of booth babes is far from restricted to the convention room floor. Ever been to a high-school dance or banquet lately. 90% of the girls wear less material than I have in my shirt. I doubt that they are "comfortable" in that little clothing. constantly tugging at hems and necklines to ensure they're (barely) covered. yet, no one thinks this has anything to do with sexism. Well, it does. If men were expected (and I mean expected) to wear that little material to formal events, there would be a riot. Women, it seems, are considered well dressed when more than 50% of their skin is exposed and the level of "well dressed" goes up from there with the amount of skin showing. That is latent sexism all around us. It's just hush hush... so why are we suddenly surprised when someone slips up and states sexist something out loud.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 13:15

One thing you haven't thought of CNET. IF there are no booth babes, over whom are technology enthusiasts to crack one off back at the hotel? Eh? Eh?

1000126319's avatar

1000126319 18 June, 2012 14:56

Good article. Very interesting to read the viewpoint of the booth babes

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 15:13

The reason women are the first to grab new technology is due to men making their women happy. For example I purchased an iPod for my wife and it took almost two years before I got my first Apple product, an iPhone 4S, which I had been wanting for a long time.

To keep our wives happy, who have lots of time to surf and browse the internet, we get them what they want, even though sometimes we cannot afford it and we put ourselves on the back burner until we can afford it.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 15:40

So what's a Transformer and who cares...

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 18:18

Of course its not sexist. Stop being silly! Its all in your mind....you are delusional!

If men want to ogle at ladies, its nothing to do with sexism! Its to do with the natural reaction of men to all things pretty!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 18:21

Natasha Lomas: who wants to have an intelligent converstation with women?..how about having an intelligent conversation with men!

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 18 June, 2012 19:14

Personally I don't stop at booths staffed by "babes" because a) it seems unlikely they were hired for their formidable knowledge of the product, and b) "babes" are famously catty to ordinary women (of COURSE I know that's an over-generalization, but it is a reason nonetheless). And companies that clearly are marketing to men annoy me (I'm thinking in stronger language) and I'm not likely to do business with them if I can avoid it.

Actually - the booth babes maybe do me a favour by letting me know where NOT to spend my money.

s1mon's avatar

s1mon 18 June, 2012 21:22

An interesting article with insight into a situation with many shades of grey. Makes me sad to see some of the FHM brigade, posting under the cloak of 'anonymous', missing the point completely. Somehow they suddenly feel that their place in the world as men is under attack, when all they are being asked to do is show a little respect. Surely they wouldn't want the same comments they have made, being directed to their sisters and their daughters instead?

And even if the whole idea of ethics is of the radar of some companies, you'd really think business sense would kick in.Why persist in a style of marketing that could drive away 50% of your potential customers? It's baffling.

leeds011's avatar

leeds011 18 June, 2012 22:11

I think that the views of some people posting confirm that there's a problem.

When my friend went for a job in Japan, people knew historically that three of the posts were allocated to women, and forty of them were allocated to men. This was a government-funded employer. Imagine that you (or a family member) were in that position, and how it would make you feel. So there's a nasty worldwide problem.

I suspect that women will be the majority of the people actually making the shiny gadgets, but the makers are rarely talked about - it's as if the gadgets have just descended magically from somewhere. There's the same pattern where the people with less power have much much less of a voice.

Finally, objectification is something which demeans both men and women. Even if the tech companies were employing topless men to advertise their products, it wouldn't make it OK. If the geeks buy into it, then it means they're even less likely to find partners than they were before. And it puts pressure on everyone to make judgements about people based on how they look, so the older men and all women are constantly looking over their shoulder wondering if they'll be replaced by a younger, more attractive model.

1000126778's avatar

1000126778 18 June, 2012 22:39

Expect the BBC to jump on this story from a great height and for Harriet Harperson to offer her two-penneth.

As for the latent sexism of this type of work and the comments you stand to hear when stood there (from a generally more socially-inadequate crowd, than at other conventions, it has to be said): don't earn a living this way, if it offends you. Most 'booth babes' are not employees of the companies, whose products are on display, but are models, so should stick to other modelling assignments, if the comments directed at them at these events are more offensive than they may hear elsewhere.

Also, why should employers delve into a 'booth babe's qualifications, when the model has simply been selected from a modelling agency? Aren't other employees likely to be offended at someone having bypassed the normal employment route?

Employing a pretty face only reflects badly if the woman is *solely* employed for that reason and it’s funny that, for all the ‘babes’ on display at conventions, the tech press rarely features them.

You make some very good points, but don't provide the evidence to justify some of them, and miss other points of view, completely.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 19 June, 2012 00:44

" You know how this could have been avoided? By not having booth babes at all, that's how."
as soon as I read this I thought to myself - apparently this 'article' is being written by a woman - prolly a fat and or homely jealous one to boot. LERL

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 20 June, 2012 11:30

Perhaps a guy should have written this article in order to lend it more credibility.... Perhaps the lady presenting the technology should not have signed up for the job in the first place.... Perhaps men should not even enter buildings in which companies present their products with the help of women.... Perhaps we should all quit complaining, look at the product and let the company that employed the tweeter decide on his/her fate for the comment.... Next up: men presenting products while only in dresses which firmly grip their butt cheeks while women look at the packages. The packaging of the products, too.

anonymous's avatar

anonymous 20 June, 2012 11:35

Now if this site had a share function for just the picture without the article....

Post your comment

Make your comment count. Log in or register to skip the 'Are you human?' question and get an avatar

Your email will not be displayed with your comment

Copy the letters and numbers to prove that you're human. You won't have to do this if you log in or register

Your comment must comply with the Terms of Use

About CBS Interactive

Copyright © 2013 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved.