Crave Talk: How flash will destroy optical and magnetic storage
Tags: house, hard disk, media player, optical
Will the hard disk be made useless after it's forced to help flash memory destroy optical media?
As flash encroaches on more of optical media's territory, I see it teaming up with hard disk drives to make on-demand the dominant method of distribution. I think we may see flash memory destroying hard disks as well. Controversial? Oh yes, very much so, but I'm going to argue why it's highly likely to be true.
Manufacturers have been toying with solid-state drives for a few years. Based on flash memory, their faster seek times are considered by many types of computer user to be advantageous over the higher sustained data transfer rates offered by hard disk drives. Apple recently offered a 64GB SSD inside its new MacBook Air laptop; Creative's Zen media player maxes out at 32GB -- a media player capacity previously only commercially achievable with 1.8-inch HDDs; and 32GB SDHC cards may effectively compete with HD discs in the eyes of the general consumer when we all move to on-demand solutions.
Although it's no secret flash memory is snowballing in both capacity and adoption, there are other concurrent movements in the CE industry -- most notably, on-demand movies and television -- that may end up harnessing and exploiting advancements in flash memory. This could ultimately help flash grow further, negating the need for optical media, and possibly magnetic storage such as the humble HDD.
Pointless war
The battle between Blu-ray and HD-DVD is one most people reclined back into a chair with a glass of Sancerre to watch, with a plan to simply hold hands with the victorious format. But with broadband Internet access gaining increasing ubiquity around the world, and on-demand media becoming ever more popular, the lifespan of the HD optical disc may be significantly shorter than previous formats used for the same purpose.
Apple's launch of on-demand movie rentals compliments its -- and others' -- existing download-to-own services, and opens up a new market for portable storage -- the flash drive. Downloading a movie over the Web makes so much sense, but without some form of transport there's no convenient way of taking that movie to a friend's house for a movie night. Buy the Blu-ray disc version of that movie and you'd not only find it easier to take it to a friend's house, but you'd also have hours and hours of 'bonus' content to enjoy too.
Pointless formats
But that makes me wonder how much point there is in excessive amounts of bonus content. I saw a demo given at the Blu-ray Disc Association's stand at CES this year, showing the 'interactive game' built into the Alien Vs. Predator BD release. I mean, come on! Something that daft, that PSOne-esque, should not be sold as a feature of an HD format. It's pretty much there to justify the existence of the generally unnecessary capacity of BD-ROMs. Give me the movie, some outtakes and a behind the scenes featurette -- which could be bundled into one on-demand download -- and I'll pop it onto a flash card should I want to take it somewhere. I doubt anyone gives a toss about a rubbish game bundled on a movie disc.
The PlayStation 3 console currently needs optical HD discs because of the naturally cumbersome volume of data required by HD games. But with the joint effort of on-demand game downloads and cheaper, higher-capacity hard disk drives, the optical disc could be disposed of, replaced by attractive blank flash drives -- a Game Card, if you want -- with which you can carry your game to a friend's house for playing on their console. The hard disk and flash disc co-operate here to negate the need of an HD disc.
But that's not all...
RELATED LINKS
AnonymousMon 21 January, 2008 12:57pm
I see a lot of your points, and it's well worth raising the issue, but there's a bit too much "ifs" and "maybes" to make this article compelling; it's too speculative.
BatteryhqMon 21 January, 2008 2:31pm
There has to be 'ifs' and 'buts'. On a topic like this, the most that can be achieved is educated speculation and i believe that Nate Lanxon has achieved this well. We can look at the current trends in flash storage and memory usage and by doing so, its possible to make very good predictions.
AnonymousTue 22 January, 2008 2:14pm
Couldn't agree more. This is precisely why the HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray arguement is virtually irrelevant already.
CartmanWed 23 January, 2008 2:55pm
I use to go through spindles of CDs burning this and that. I found myself constantly needing more CD/DVD racks for my music and movies and now a CD spindle I went through in a month has lasted me 2 years. I use flash memory and HDD a vast majority of my software purchases be it games through apps like Steam or music through iTunes and other music services. I've begun to hate optical media especially since I've moved to using my laptop for 99% of the time so lugging around a bunch of optical media is a pain. Flash is the future but while storage capacity is so small for the amount you have to pay there will still be room for optical media and HDD - especially for space hogs like HD movies.
DavidRGilsonFri 25 January, 2008 12:16am
Posted my response here:
digitalranger (dot) livejournal (dot) com (slash) 179842.html
AnonymousSat 26 January, 2008 1:06pm
Raises the question of archived material though... i have ripped all my cds but they provide an invaluable robust backup store when the HDD (or whatever) inevitably breaks down due to continuous use. Always nice to have that physical thing in hands feeling too. I wonder what future archaeologists will discover of our time on this planet when everything seems to be moving towards such transient storage.
AnonymousMon 18 February, 2008 1:59pm
yeah, right, bla bla bla... if you have a lot of money to buy 32GB sdhc cards or a 64GB SSD disks, got ahead, but that doesn't mean that it will be the next big thing. the cost for producing flash memory had been, still is, and will be high. that's why flash memory is not used as main memory in computers. I think there's a lot of road ahead before we see that technology as standard, replacing optic and magnetic disks. wake me up when it becomes as cheap as a DVD-R.
AnonymousSat 2 August, 2008 2:41am
Soon all memory will be replaced with NRAM.
AnonymousWed 8 October, 2008 4:40am
For what it seems right now the only thing holding back USD from overtaking optical disc is really the price tag. I believe the Blue ray disc can hold 50 gb while a top end Flash drive can hold 64 gb. Preformance wise the flash drive should in the next couple of years completely outclass optical disc however the price tag may keep them from becoming the standard amongst all industries.

Ask questions, share opinions and find answers in the CNET.co.uk forums


Next Photo
BatteryhqMon 21 January, 2008 12:35pm
An accurate roundup and i can see things going that way. I have replaced everything but my 500gb external HDD with flash; my days of CD burning seem to be long gone. And when flash can give me a suitable replacement for my external HDD (at a reasonable price) ill have that too.