Ears-on with the Klipsch Image earphones
Tags: klipsch, pair, ear, denon
Ever since listening to Jays' q-Jays -- a minute pair of dual-armature earphones -- we've been convinced that amazing sound can come from truly tiny earphone packages. But Jays has some serious competition now from a serious audiophile company, Klipsch.
The Klipsch Image earphones arrived on our desk yesterday and after 24 hours with them we've managed to form a solid early opinion. Overall, these £200 sound-isolating earphones offer a practically unrivalled level of comfort. Their minuscule aluminium enclosures go beyond the realms of discreet and sit ergonomically in the ear, sealed in place with comfortable silicon tips.
Sound quality is immediately impressive, with a strong voice and balanced highs and lows. What you don't get is ear-splitting bass -- though it's still very intense -- or a crystalline high-end. Instead, the Images deliver a warm tone with powerful mids. Some people may feel the warm characteristic is overly prominent at the expense of explicit detail, but this is highly subjective and really boils down to personal preference.
Given the choice between the Images and a pair of Denon's excellent AH-C751s, we'd still plump for the Denons, despite their massive enclosures and intrusive nature. We're extremely fond of the Images and think they excel with acoustic, vocal and classic music -- if this is your music of choice, the images will certainly not disappoint. But as big metal, dance and urban fans at Crave, we favour the deep power, detail and clarity of the Denon sound.
Look out for our full review in the coming week for the full lowdown. -Nate Lanxon
Update: Read our full Klipsch Image sound-isolating earphones review.
RELATED LINKS
RELATED REVIEWS
Nate LanxonTue 29 April, 2008 2:57pm
Yes, I'm very fond of the SE530s. Probably my favourite earphones of all time, but you must admit they're much clunkier design-wise than the Images.
AnonymousTue 29 April, 2008 10:06pm
I've got the klipsch image and I listened to both at first, I encode my music at 320kps and I couldn't tell the difference in sound quality between the two. The klipsch is much smaller, cheaper (£175ish at Amazon), easier to get a fit and comfortable. There might be a tiny sound difference when encoded in loseless formats but I doubt that would warrant you buying it unless you want the heavy duty cable of the shure's.

Ask questions, share opinions and find answers in the CNET.co.uk forums



AnonymousTue 29 April, 2008 12:59pm
Or get a pair of sure se530s for £225 from play.com and get even better sound with as much bass as you can throw at them and a clear tight high end.