Hands-on with the iRiver E100: nano botherer hits UK
Tags: iriver, mini, pad, headphones
Ever since seeing iRiver's new range of MP3 players back at CES in January, we've been itching to get models to take home and use. We've just been sent one of the first iRiver E100 players in the UK and in many ways we're extremely taken.
The 4GB (£80) and 8GB (£100) capacities on offer are expandable with microSD up to 8GB, and the players come with built-in microphones, line-in sockets, built-in mini stereo speakers, video playback and, like the iPod nano, come in a variety of colours.
The player itself feels pretty lightweight and it's reasonably attractive. It's a little reminiscent of the Archos 105, meaning it's got a slightly budget feel to it. However, that big ol' 61mm (2.4-inch) colour screen is better than the Archos, despite being fairly low-res, with individual pixels clearly visible. Navigation is very simple -- if sluggish to use -- and requires the use of a simple four-way control pad underneath the screen.
After getting some music on to the players by simply dragging and dropping MP3s through Windows, we had a quick blast to test sound quality. iRiver has never blown us away with audio performance, but it's always been acceptable. The same is true for the E100 -- it lacks the in-your-face quality from Cowon or Apple's iPod classic, but it's above average. Paired with our Denon AH-D5000 reference headphones, the difference between the iPod classic and the E100 is obvious. But using cheap bundled headphones, it's less so.
Video quality's average, and again it's two steps behind the iPod nano in terms of sharpness and colour depth, and a step behind iRiver's own Clix 2 -- a player we're still in love with from 2007.
This all said, the E100 is more affordable, and a step up from cheaper alternatives, such as the mediocre Archos 105. After spending a small amount of time with it, we'd say it's a usable and friendly alternative to anything by Apple, but if you use the two side-by-side, you'll realise the extra money spent on an iPod or a Creative Zen gives you significantly better video and audio performance, though usability is on a par with the Zen.
Expect our full review extremely soon. In the meantime, click through our extended gallery for a plethora of snaps to give you a closer inspection of this likeable new player.
By the way, did you know this player shares a model number with a £50 toilet seat? No, neither did we. -Nate Lanxon
Update: Read our full iRiver E100 review.
RELATED LINKS
n47h4nThu 10 April, 2008 4:38pm
well I don't agree with anon, but the comment I just wrote hasn't appeared :-( Anyway, you're wrong.
AnonymousSat 10 May, 2008 12:31pm
Dear Anonymous, ipods are fantastic cus they look sratchtastic after two weeks, they are uncomfortable to handle, way too expensive, you cannot change the battery, itunes (nudge, nudge) you cannot expand the memory, yawn, the list goes on and on and on, guess what, they reckon Apple are launching an ipod bog seat - now that will be usefull wont it.
AnonymousWed 14 May, 2008 9:37am
Let me see.. I think samsung rocks more than ipod:D. Should try it cause its damn classic and they have more variety on how you want the atmosphere to be like. Go try it and you will know what im talking about. And ipod is just the same old thing. Since its so good, it cant get any better than before:)

Ask questions, share opinions and find answers in the CNET.co.uk forums


Next Photo
AnonymousWed 9 April, 2008 10:43pm
Yawn. Are there still MP3 player manufacturers other than Apple out there? What's the point? The industry has proven it can't compete. It's been what? Five, eight, maybe ten years? Ands still they haven't matched the usability of the original iPod. What a waste of metal and plastic.