Apple's new iPod touch, nano and classic: Hands firmly on

By Nate Lanxon on 06 September 2007, 10:45am

11Pages

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
11

So, all in all it was an evening of excitement, tantalising products and Apple fanboys approaching europhoria. But we do have a few negative comments to make.

Firstly, why not give the iPod touch a 160GB hard disk? Surely a player as capable as the touch would benefit from more space for video? We guess that product size and cost were primary reasons for not building this sort of iPod. Apple claims that user satisfaction with the iPhone is higher than for any other Apple product in history. With this in mind, we can maybe understand Apple's reasoning behind avoiding any significant changes to such a well-received device.

Secondly, where are The Beatles on iTunes, dammit? We thought that was a dead cert.

You can expect our reviews of each new Apple product as soon, if not sooner, as physically possible. Until then, carry on browsing our tasty iPod shots and get those wallets out -- it's upgrade time.