Intel Core i7 CPU tested
To put the Core i7-965 Extreme Edition in perspective, we compared it with the year-old Core 2 Extreme QX9650. The Core i7 boasts a faster clock speed and an L3 cache shared by the four cores that's four times larger than that of the older chip. With the integrated RAM controller on Core i7 replacing the need for a front side bus, the platforms are quite different from each other, so the specs don't tell the whole story. The performance results speak more clearly.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Longer bars indicate faster performance)
| Rendering multiple CPUs | Rendering single CPU |
(1,024x768, low-quality, no AA/AF)
(Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
| Load | Idle |
The Core i7 chip is faster than the QX9650 on every test, but we were most impressed by the CineBench multicore test and the Far Cry 2 benchmark, where Intel's new CPU established a sizable performance advantage. Gamers and digital-media editors may well have assumed that Core i7 is worth their attention. As we can see from our testing, any such assumption is clearly justified.
We should add that the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 was actually surpassed earlier by the Core 2 Extreme QX9770, a £1,000 CPU that uses Intel's X48 chipset. Time constraints prevented us from testing that CPU as well, but based on early results from PC World Greece (via Engadget), it appears that Core i7 trounces that chip as well.
Power consumption
You'll note from our power-consumption tests that the Core i7 consumes almost the exact same amount of energy both at idle and while under load. We didn't expect major gains here, as each chip uses the same 45-nanometer process, runs at a similar clock speed, and with roughly the same number of transistors.
Typically Intel gains power efficiency with chips introduced in a 'tock' year, which involves a more efficient design of the chips from a 'tick' year such as these. The Core i7-965 Extreme may have improved its relative power usage, in that it uses fewer transistors to do more work and at faster clock speeds than the older Core 2 Extreme chips. But anyone building a system with this new processor should expect to need an equivalently beefy power supply, especially if you intend to add multiple graphics cards and hard drives.
Source: Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition review on CNET.com
-
-
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 review in Reviews
- Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 review in Reviews
- Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 review in Reviews
- Dell Adamo review in Reviews









To get an avatar and username, log in or register
Anonymous User